Carl Froch vs Michael Spinks @ 175

For Neil.

 

Spinks was a cautious guy and Froch would be very alert with his right cross so it would go the distance. Spinks' jab would probably earn him enough points in a close decision win

 

Gonna go out on a limb here & voice a controversial opinion.. I think Spinks probably outclasses Froch

 

:bears:

 

Froch gets knocked out

 

Spinks would run around like a puta and win the controversial decision

 

Carl fraud get jinxed so bad they call him the fightin famine

 

Depends on HOW Froch Fights...

If he's CAUTIOUS, he Could Last 12-15...If he's his USUAL Self, he Gets STRETCHED...



REED:fightme:

 

Froch's wife would be a vulnerable widow in need of comfort within 10.

 

I don't think there's any way Froch goes the distance, regardless of his tactics

 

Spinks by stoppage around the 8th round or so. Spinks was sometimes a slow starter, so Froch might look like he has a chance for a few rounds, but eventually Spinks starts to open up and Froch has no answer for it.

 

REED, I wasn't aware that a "cautious" Froch had a good defense.

Cautious Froch doesn't exist though. To his credit, the guy simply has too much balls to go out like a bitch.

Spinks would knock him senseless at some point, but Carl would go out like a man.

 

For comedy value, check out Michael Spinks in the audience at Vitali vs Kirk Johnson. Spinks is like a guy who is being forced to sit through a video of his wife being spit roasted by Dick Cheney at one end and John Holmes at the other. He's both livid and on the verge of a nervous babbling breakdown at the same time.