James Toney vs. Bernard Hopkins.

Discussion in 'Mythical Matchups' started by VG_Addict, Mar 31, 2014.

  1. Haymaker

    Haymaker WBC Silver Diamond Emeritus Champ

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2003
    Messages:
    12,166
    Likes Received:
    1
    Which Hopkins are we talking about here? The MW Hopkins was more aggressive and traded punches frequently, which would make Toney the favorite. A seasoned post-Tito Hopkins would be more cautious and bore us to a 12 rd decision win.
     
  2. REEDsART

    REEDsART MATCHMAKER

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2003
    Messages:
    58,747
    Likes Received:
    4,600
    Location:
    CURTIS COKES' Birthplace...
    The ONLY Guy to Ever LUNGE @ James Toney w/Any Degree of Success was a YOUNG Roy Jones...NO Version of Bernard Hopkins, that EVER Existed, Approaches Young Roy's ATHLETIC Prowess OR LUNGES @ James Toney for 12 Rounds & WINS...

    If Bernard LUNGES 1nce or 2wice, he Eventually Gets Met w/UPPERCUTS on his Way In...




    REED:hammert:
     
  3. whiskey

    whiskey Czarcasm

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2002
    Messages:
    47,694
    Likes Received:
    5,364

    Hopkins doesn't lunge in anything remotely like Roy. He does it "cheaply" by covering the bases and wading in to feign aggression. It makes it sometimes appear like the opponent is the one doing the clinching. Then he acts annoyed like he wanted to fight but the other guy is negating the action! :shit: . It's a hybrid of Camacho and Ruiz tactics.
     
  4. loadedgloves

    loadedgloves "Twinkle Toes" McJack

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2010
    Messages:
    6,945
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yeah, but Hopkins understood that too, and even in his prime he was a very economic fighter. That's not good for Toney. I agree that if they fought 10 times, I could easily see each one winning 5, all close decisions.
     
  5. cdogg187

    cdogg187 GLADYS

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2002
    Messages:
    90,394
    Likes Received:
    4,377
    Occupation:
    SUCK MY BALLS!!
    Location:
    Beyond The Pale

    Michael Nunn was ahead by miles when he got stupid and started overcommitting to offense, planting his feet... that is what enabled Toney to start having success and eventually turn the tables... Had Nunn not been a moron, he wins that fight by a good 6 points
     
  6. cdogg187

    cdogg187 GLADYS

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2002
    Messages:
    90,394
    Likes Received:
    4,377
    Occupation:
    SUCK MY BALLS!!
    Location:
    Beyond The Pale
    Hopkins was far more intelligent than Nunn, more versatile and tougher... He was a better fighter
     
  7. Xplosive

    Xplosive X-MOD Bad Motherfucker

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2003
    Messages:
    56,693
    Likes Received:
    13,759
    Location:
    Your girl's crib
    Toney's body attack had something to do with Nunn's feet planting.

    I'll say again, this is a very close fight if we're talking about the Toney from the first McCallum fight. Toney was robbed in that fight as far as I'm concerned. He beat McCallum close, but clear that night.
     
  8. cdogg187

    cdogg187 GLADYS

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2002
    Messages:
    90,394
    Likes Received:
    4,377
    Occupation:
    SUCK MY BALLS!!
    Location:
    Beyond The Pale
    I disagree... I think it was a neglible factor at best

    The rest I agree with... I think Toney won that fight as well and I have never said this wouldn't be close
     
  9. Neil

    Neil tueur de grenouilles

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2006
    Messages:
    39,259
    Likes Received:
    4,377
    Occupation:
    The Cal Ripken of Alcoholism
    David Tiberi vs the second market....who wins?
     

Share This Page