Felix Trinidad vs. Ricky Hatton @ WW

Discussion in 'Mythical Matchups' started by Dog Jones, Nov 11, 2015.

  1. Dog Jones

    Dog Jones WBC Silver Diamond Emeritus Champ

    Joined:
    May 3, 2010
    Messages:
    14,684
    Likes Received:
    1,306
    Without the wraps
     
  2. ILLUMINATI

    ILLUMINATI Roberto Duran

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2002
    Messages:
    33,901
    Likes Received:
    1,386
    Trinidad by KO 3.
     
  3. Xplosive

    Xplosive X-MOD Bad Motherfucker

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2003
    Messages:
    55,655
    Likes Received:
    13,256
    Location:
    Your girl's crib
    Hatton gets Zulu'd.
     
  4. puerto rock

    puerto rock WBC Silver Diamond Emeritus Champ

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2003
    Messages:
    12,200
    Likes Received:
    1,466
    Trinidad KO 4
     
  5. Destruction and Mayhem

    Destruction and Mayhem PHASE ----3

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2010
    Messages:
    45,325
    Likes Received:
    1,079
    Location:
    Earth
    word.
     
  6. Hut*Hut

    Hut*Hut The Mackintosh of temazepam

    Joined:
    May 17, 2005
    Messages:
    70,789
    Likes Received:
    5,948
    Occupation:
    Involved in hyperbole
    Location:
    Interzone
    Lord, poor Rickeeeeeeeh.
     
  7. Destruction and Mayhem

    Destruction and Mayhem PHASE ----3

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2010
    Messages:
    45,325
    Likes Received:
    1,079
    Location:
    Earth
    word.

    It's a frightful mismatch....a Hearns-Duran type mismatch.
     
  8. Double L

    Double L Book Reader

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2003
    Messages:
    28,633
    Likes Received:
    1,822
    How is Hearns Duran a mismatch?
     
  9. Xplosive

    Xplosive X-MOD Bad Motherfucker

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2003
    Messages:
    55,655
    Likes Received:
    13,256
    Location:
    Your girl's crib
    Hearns-Duran turned out to be a mismatch IN THE RING, but on paper it wasn't a mismatch, and going in it wasn't considered to be a mismatch.

    Trinidad-Hatton is a mismatch on paper, and would have lived up to its mismatch expectations in the ring.
     
  10. Destruction and Mayhem

    Destruction and Mayhem PHASE ----3

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2010
    Messages:
    45,325
    Likes Received:
    1,079
    Location:
    Earth
    lol

    I take it you didn't know they fought?
     
  11. Destruction and Mayhem

    Destruction and Mayhem PHASE ----3

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2010
    Messages:
    45,325
    Likes Received:
    1,079
    Location:
    Earth
    In the ring, on paper, doesn't matter...it was a mismatch and would have been a mismatch had they fought ten times. Just like Foreman Frazier.
     
  12. Rich ´Money´ Mustard

    Rich ´Money´ Mustard DIE!

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2011
    Messages:
    24,176
    Likes Received:
    3,128
    At the time, Hearns probably did think it was a mismatch - he was convicned he was going put Duran Duran's lights out and constantly referred to him as 'Little Duran'.
     
  13. puerto rock

    puerto rock WBC Silver Diamond Emeritus Champ

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2003
    Messages:
    12,200
    Likes Received:
    1,466
    I don't think Hearns-Duran at 147 is a mismatch.

    Hearns wins but I think it's much more competitive.
     
  14. Double L

    Double L Book Reader

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2003
    Messages:
    28,633
    Likes Received:
    1,822
    This was exactly what I meant.

    The other thing is, if the two had fought again it is in no way assured that Hearns would've won.
     
  15. whiskey

    whiskey Czarcasm

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2002
    Messages:
    47,300
    Likes Received:
    5,135
    Why?
     
  16. Xplosive

    Xplosive X-MOD Bad Motherfucker

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2003
    Messages:
    55,655
    Likes Received:
    13,256
    Location:
    Your girl's crib
    I don't agree with that last statement. I can't ever favor Duran over Hearns above 147. He never beats him at 154.

    But the difference is, it's not about a difference in quality. Hearns was too big for Duran, and had entirely the WROOONNGGG style for Duran.

    In Trinidad-Hatton, Ricky has THREE major things going against him. 1. He's a lot smaller than Tito, 2. The styles are bad for him, and 3. Trinidad was just plain and simple several levels better than Hatton.

    Hearns wasn't BETTER than Duran. Not overall, anyway. He was better than Duran at junior middle.
     
  17. Double L

    Double L Book Reader

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2003
    Messages:
    28,633
    Likes Received:
    1,822
    I didn't say I would pick Duran to win. But I would not rule out the possibility.

    Duran showed against SRL and Hagler, among others, that he could adjust and have success against larger opponents.
     
  18. Double L

    Double L Book Reader

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2003
    Messages:
    28,633
    Likes Received:
    1,822
    Because Duran was an all time great fighter who showed amazing versatility and the ability to adjust against the likes of SRL and Hagler. He probably loses but nobody can convince me he does not have a chance.
     
  19. Erratic

    Erratic "Twinkle Toes" McJack

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2003
    Messages:
    9,106
    Likes Received:
    913
    Occupation:
    Professional Bum
    Home Page:
    Hatton throws one of his wide left hooks and gets hit with Tito's famous left hook in the process. Hatton gets up but is finished soon after.

    Trinidad TKO 3

    I think Hearns is all wrong for Duran. At 147 in 1980, Duran would give a better showing, but I think he gets stopped in the mid rounds.
     
  20. REEDsART

    REEDsART MATCHMAKER

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2003
    Messages:
    57,903
    Likes Received:
    4,341
    Location:
    CURTIS COKES' Birthplace...
    UNDERSIZED Maulers have a 0% Chance of Beating Tito Trinidad...It's Doubtful ANY Version of Hatton Lasts More than 5-6 Rounds w/ANY Version of Trinidad...




    REED
     
  21. REEDsART

    REEDsART MATCHMAKER

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2003
    Messages:
    57,903
    Likes Received:
    4,341
    Location:
    CURTIS COKES' Birthplace...
    There's Literally NATHAN to Be Deduced from Hearns-Duran, that Suggests or Even Insinuates Duran Had a CHANCE in a RE...

    Barely Laid a Glove on Hearns, Never 1nce Got INSIDE Hearns' Reach...Not Only Did Hearns KEEP Duran on the End of His Loooooooooomg Punches, but Duran Clearly COULDN'T Handle The Incoming Either...It's like Saying Floyd Patterson Would've "Figured Out a Way" to Beat Sonny Liston...





    REED
     
  22. Ugotabe Kidding

    Ugotabe Kidding WBC Silver Diamond Emeritus Champ

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2002
    Messages:
    17,162
    Likes Received:
    1,714
    Home Page:
    Maybe Double L means the adjustments that Duran was able to make between 1st and 2nd Leonard fights
     
  23. Double L

    Double L Book Reader

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2003
    Messages:
    28,633
    Likes Received:
    1,822
    Nothing if you "LiTeRaLlY" ignore the man's entire body of work and pretend Hearns had no vulnerabilities of his own.

    Again, before you forget, I'm in no way suggesting anyone should've expected Duran to win a rematch or make Hearns anything but a giant favorite to win it. That is not what I am arguing. What I "am" saying is that duran would've had a chance to win it. And this is based on the fact that Duran was a great fighter.
     
  24. Destruction and Mayhem

    Destruction and Mayhem PHASE ----3

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2010
    Messages:
    45,325
    Likes Received:
    1,079
    Location:
    Earth
    So Frazier had a chance to beat Foreman in a rematch?
     
  25. Double L

    Double L Book Reader

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2003
    Messages:
    28,633
    Likes Received:
    1,822
    Is Hearns foreman? Is Duran frazier? Look. We disagree on this. No amount of ill-conceived analogies from you will change that.
     
  26. whiskey

    whiskey Czarcasm

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2002
    Messages:
    47,300
    Likes Received:
    5,135
    Not even these?

    [​IMG]
     
  27. Double L

    Double L Book Reader

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2003
    Messages:
    28,633
    Likes Received:
    1,822
  28. lb 4 lb

    lb 4 lb Fightbeat Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2004
    Messages:
    15,231
    Likes Received:
    1,102
    Gender:
    Male
    Are you guys fucking kidding me? No, I ain't letting this shit ride. How about this? Tito ko rd 1. No lasting 3 or 4 rounds, no fucking TKO, I'm talking Hatton uncouncious on the apron just like against Paquiao. Are you guys seriously giving Hatton 3 to 4 rounds against Tito? Hatton? A jr welterweight who never looked that good at welter and got Ko'd by hands of straw Mayweather? On top of all that Hatton's style isn't even conducive to him seeing round two. He's an aggressive body puncher who comes forward throwing wide looping hooks to the body that would be just begging for that beautiful Trinidad counter left hook. He gets the Vargas treatment, only he doesn't make it out of round one.
     
  29. Hut*Hut

    Hut*Hut The Mackintosh of temazepam

    Joined:
    May 17, 2005
    Messages:
    70,789
    Likes Received:
    5,948
    Occupation:
    Involved in hyperbole
    Location:
    Interzone
    :lol::lol::lol:
     
  30. Xplosive

    Xplosive X-MOD Bad Motherfucker

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2003
    Messages:
    55,655
    Likes Received:
    13,256
    Location:
    Your girl's crib
    KO 1 is a possibility. I kinda thought 4 rounds was being generous to Hatton as well.

    But I'll give Hatton the benefit of the doubt, and say Tito KO 2.
     

Share This Page