BREAKING NEWS: Dr Strange - Trailer/Discussion

First trailer:

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/Lt-U_t2pUHI" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

 

Can't...wait!!!

I read a lot of non-initiated complaining about some scenes in the trailer that seems to be ripping-off Nolan's 'Inception', 'Batman Begins', 'Interstellar' & also 'The Matrix'. To those people I say: BULLSHIT!!! Doctor Strange comicbook is older than all those films and all those elements were already in the comicbooks that if anything might have inspired Nolan & the Matrix sisters with their films visuals. It is like when 'Childhood's End' was finally made and some idiots were stating it was ripping-off elements of 'Independence Day', 'V' and 'Alien-nation'. All those films copied the concepts from the book, same happened here.

 

This first trailer is actually better than the entire Batman v Superman movie...

 

:scratcher: you gave 'BvS' a positive review if I remember well.

 

BvS is better than given credit for.

 

No - I rewatched it....marked it down.

Marvel movies just seem to be so much better made. Even Captain America: Civil War looks interesting even though I'm not thrilled about it...DC movies are always 'try hards'...

 

Anyone watch any big boy films around here?

 

Seen em all...and can easily re-watch them too.
These types of movies now I can watch once and forget.

The 1950s-1970s were the great era for 'Big Boys and Girls' movies...but Hollywood just dumbs everything down for the general masses now.

Sad to say.

 

Make your own porn thread. issed:

 

Great poster


Behold Mads Mikkelsen as the villain Kaecilius, a minor baddie from the Silver Age comicbooks...odd choice.

 

This will be another movie praised by Marvell-payed-critics.

 

Of course! That is why we are on Disney's payroll!

 

And it will be another great Marvel movie, nonetheless! :bears:

 

This movie is going to kick ass! will be better that that DC fiasco 'Batman v Superman: Yawn of Soltice'

 

Andonionitony - you´re such a scream!

 

Yup.
Because it´s Marvel and its fuckin´ ´A´.

 

I've been excited for this movie the most out of the other 2016 comic book movie releases.

 

Me too. This one and 'Star Wars: Rogue ONE'. First one in November then the next one in December.

 

Hopefully Rogue One won't be another remake.

 

That is not your motto! :nono:

 

Hhhmmmnnn...

 

They are bringing back that douche from Avengers?

 

how so?

 

Loki is Marvel most popular villain: he was in THOR, THE AVENGERS, THOR: THE DARK WORLD, was in THE AVENGERS: AGE OF ULTRON, but his scenes were deleted, will have a important part in the upcoming THOR: RAGNAROK as well as THE AVENGERS: INFINITY WAR and rumor has it...that...there is...a...Strange...connection...with...a certain...sorcerer...

Because Kaecillus was a very minor early villain in the Strange comics. They could have chosen a bigger & more popular villain like Darkness, Amora the Enchantress, Dormammu or Father Voodu. I can see the tradition of going close to its origins with this choice, but heck, 99% of audiences will not know (or care) which villain came first.

 

Why havent Marvel incorporated these characters yet:







Thanos, Ronan The Accuser, Guardians Of The Galaxy and Dr Strange have been done.....why cant Marvel get these major characters in?

 

Same situation as with Fantastic Four?

 

All those characters you pictured here belong to the Fantastic Four universe whose copyrights are still kept hostage by FOX. Believe me: Marvel is dying to get Galactus & the Silver Surfer (FF are already too damaged by FOX though). Those two characters could fit so nicely in Infinity War or a Guardians of the Galaxy film, or heck a SILVER SURFER FILM!!!!

 

How did Fox manage to acquire the rights to just those characters?