Zab Judah vs Hector Camacho

Discussion in 'Mythical Matchups' started by Ugotabe Kidding, Dec 3, 2019.

  1. Ugotabe Kidding

    Ugotabe Kidding WBC Silver Diamond Emeritus Champ

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2002
    Messages:
    17,162
    Likes Received:
    1,714
    Home Page:
    Been done often, but not in a while.

    How do you see this going? Camacho by far the better fighter but I could see Zab's speed and punch give him trouble as Camacho doesn't have the power to whack Judah out quickly
     
  2. Xplosive

    Xplosive X-MOD Bad Motherfucker

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2003
    Messages:
    57,426
    Likes Received:
    14,040
    Location:
    Your girl's crib
    As long as we're talking about the prime Camacho, he schools Zab. Since this is at 140, we can use the Camacho who dominated Howard Davis.

    Judah has power over him, but given Camacho's dependable chin, that wouldn't mean much. Judah doesn't have anything else over Hector. Camacho is one of the few fighters in history with a clear handspeed edge over Judah, and that would really bother Zab.

    On top of which, Camacho was just a far better technician.

    8-4, or 9-3 UD for Camacho
     
  3. Double L

    Double L Book Reader

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2003
    Messages:
    28,990
    Likes Received:
    1,907
    Judah would crumble under the onslaught of Camacho's doggie-paddle jab
     
  4. Xplosive

    Xplosive X-MOD Bad Motherfucker

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2003
    Messages:
    57,426
    Likes Received:
    14,040
    Location:
    Your girl's crib
    Prime Camacho could hurt Judah.

    If he could hurt Ramirez, he could certainly hurt Judah.
     
  5. whiskey

    whiskey Czarcasm

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2002
    Messages:
    48,349
    Likes Received:
    5,546
    Judah has the tools to beat Camacho, but not the boxing IQ. Zab would land some nice shots here and there but overall it goes to a decision which Camacho wins.
     
  6. cdogg187

    cdogg187 GLADYS

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2002
    Messages:
    90,376
    Likes Received:
    4,377
    Occupation:
    SUCK MY BALLS!!
    Location:
    Beyond The Pale
    This would be absolutely hideous to watch
     
  7. whiskey

    whiskey Czarcasm

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2002
    Messages:
    48,349
    Likes Received:
    5,546
    I can hear the commentary already trying to convince the viewers what they're watching isn't crap as the rounds go by.

    "High speed chess" would probably be a term used. This is one for the "purists". Kellerman would make comparisons to Fischer-Spassky and Leonard-Hearns.
     
    cdogg187 likes this.
  8. Xplosive

    Xplosive X-MOD Bad Motherfucker

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2003
    Messages:
    57,426
    Likes Received:
    14,040
    Location:
    Your girl's crib
    I don't think it's a given that it would boring.

    Both guys turned boring later in their careers, but pre-Tszyu Judah and pre-Rosario Camacho were both fairly exciting fighters.
     
  9. whiskey

    whiskey Czarcasm

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2002
    Messages:
    48,349
    Likes Received:
    5,546
    As in before pre-front-running?
     
    cdogg187 likes this.
  10. cdogg187

    cdogg187 GLADYS

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2002
    Messages:
    90,376
    Likes Received:
    4,377
    Occupation:
    SUCK MY BALLS!!
    Location:
    Beyond The Pale
    Camacho was never particularly exciting, IMO

    But his “exciting” days ended when Edwin Rosario proved to him that yes he could be hit and yes it hurt

    And when Reyes Cruz decked him early on only a few fights later, he fully became the negative, spoiling creep we all despised for the remainder of his career

    Judah was freaked out by anybody with the ability to put hands on him that was still standing after 5 rounds, especially if they had any pop... of course, that’s not a big concern for him here

    Ultimately, I’d pick Camacho by decision because he’s a more skilled boxer but this fight would be fucking terrible with lots of extracurricular bullshit before, between rounds and after but nothing exciting or aesthetically appealing during any of the 12 3-minute blocks of “action”
     

Share This Page