Buddy McGirt vs Tim Bradley

Discussion in 'Mythical Matchups' started by Xplosive, Apr 24, 2020.

  1. Xplosive

    Xplosive X-MOD Bad Motherfucker

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2003
    Messages:
    55,640
    Likes Received:
    13,248
    Location:
    Your girl's crib
    At 140 or 147.

    Realistically both guys were in their physical primes at 140. Both were small welterweights.
     
  2. cdogg187

    cdogg187 GLADYS

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2002
    Messages:
    90,394
    Likes Received:
    4,376
    Occupation:
    SUCK MY BALLS!!
    Location:
    Beyond The Pale
    Make Bradley 140 and McGirt 147 and they’re the same size in the ring and Buddy beats him because he’s better at everything
     
  3. Xplosive

    Xplosive X-MOD Bad Motherfucker

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2003
    Messages:
    55,640
    Likes Received:
    13,248
    Location:
    Your girl's crib
    Oh Jesus Christ.

    McGirt fought in the 24-hr weigh-in era.
     
  4. cdogg187

    cdogg187 GLADYS

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2002
    Messages:
    90,394
    Likes Received:
    4,376
    Occupation:
    SUCK MY BALLS!!
    Location:
    Beyond The Pale
    Yeah before rehydration two weight classes up was standard practice

    why do you think Gerald McClellan looked so much bigger than his opponents? Because he was way ahead of the curve gaining 10+ pounds overnight

    Welterweights today weigh 160 in the fucking ring... if you think McGirt weighed 160, you’re a blind motherfucker
     
  5. Xplosive

    Xplosive X-MOD Bad Motherfucker

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2003
    Messages:
    55,640
    Likes Received:
    13,248
    Location:
    Your girl's crib
    I dont remember Bradley as a guy who put on egregious weight at 140. He was putting on about 10 pounds, which is normal. I dont think it would matter if he had 3-5 pounds over Buddy.

    I agree that McGirt was better.

    If a guy is a better fighter, 3-4 fuckin pounds is not gonna matter.

    20 pounds would matter, but Tim wouldnt have 20 pounds on him.
     
  6. cdogg187

    cdogg187 GLADYS

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2002
    Messages:
    90,394
    Likes Received:
    4,376
    Occupation:
    SUCK MY BALLS!!
    Location:
    Beyond The Pale
    Ten pounds, so at 140 he was 150

    McGirt at 147 was probably around 150 himself ... the match makes sense as I envisioned it


    CUUUUUNT
     
  7. Xplosive

    Xplosive X-MOD Bad Motherfucker

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2003
    Messages:
    55,640
    Likes Received:
    13,248
    Location:
    Your girl's crib
    When McGirt was at 140 he probably came into the ring at 145-147. He fought in the goddamn 24-hr weigh-in era... putting on 5-7 pounds is EASYYYY and it's normal.

    Timmy having 3-4 pounds on him is not gonna matter.
     
  8. cdogg187

    cdogg187 GLADYS

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2002
    Messages:
    90,394
    Likes Received:
    4,376
    Occupation:
    SUCK MY BALLS!!
    Location:
    Beyond The Pale
    SHUT THE FUCK UP!!!!
    :Knee::Knee::Knee::Knee::Knee::Knee:
     
  9. Dog Jones

    Dog Jones WBC Silver Diamond Emeritus Champ

    Joined:
    May 3, 2010
    Messages:
    14,675
    Likes Received:
    1,305
    When peak Bradley fought Pacquiao 3x, he didn't re-hydrate at all. So McGirt just out-boxes either 140 or WW version anyway
     
  10. Xplosive

    Xplosive X-MOD Bad Motherfucker

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2003
    Messages:
    55,640
    Likes Received:
    13,248
    Location:
    Your girl's crib
    McDogg thinks every single fighter today gains 25 pounds post-weigh-in and thinks that same-day weigh-in guys remained at the exact same weight they weigh-in at.
     

Share This Page