Greater/Better: Donald Curry vs Ricardo Lopez

Discussion in 'General Boxing Discussion' started by Xplosive, Sep 2, 2021.

  1. Xplosive

    Xplosive X-MOD Bad Motherfucker

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2003
    Messages:
    56,789
    Likes Received:
    13,813
    Location:
    Your girl's crib
    Random as Hell, I know.
     
  2. Jesus of montreal

    Jesus of montreal WBC Silver Diamond Emeritus Champ

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2006
    Messages:
    13,386
    Likes Received:
    2,248
    Probably lopez for both, but i might be overrating him since his opposition wasn't all that
     
  3. George Crowcroft

    George Crowcroft "Twinkle Toes" McJack

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2020
    Messages:
    5,557
    Likes Received:
    3,346
    Gender:
    Male
    Depends on how you value consistency and how much emphasis you put on Curry's downfall. No matter how you split it, Curry's résumé takes a massive steaming shit on Lopez's.

    Lopez was a better technician IMO. He also had a much more aesthetically pleasing style.
     
    Flo-Raiden and Xplosive like this.
  4. Xplosive

    Xplosive X-MOD Bad Motherfucker

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2003
    Messages:
    56,789
    Likes Received:
    13,813
    Location:
    Your girl's crib
    This is tough. What I would say is:

    1. Curry's resume is without question deeper.

    2. 84-85 Curry was arguably the better/more talented of the two.

    3. However, it's hard to envision Lopez losing P4P to a Honeyghan-level fighter. Lopez would probably annihilate a guy like Honeyghan.

    4. Despite being less physically talented, Lopez was more complete and without question had a much better chin.

    5. I'm pretty critical of Lopez, but really, his resume was a bit better than given credit for. Curry still has bigger wins, especially Starling.

    So, it's really a tough call. Greatness might be a wash. Lopez has become more glorified, however, at no point was Ricardo Lopez the P4P #1. Curry was.

    In terms of better? I'd probably go with Lopez. Again, Finito was less of a physical phenom, but more skilled and tougher. Lopez was also a bigger puncher, P4P, FWIW.
     
    Last edited: Sep 3, 2021
    Flo-Raiden likes this.
  5. Flo-Raiden

    Flo-Raiden Undisputed Champion

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2020
    Messages:
    2,553
    Likes Received:
    1,449
    Gender:
    Male
    It's a matter of how you view a short prime with some good names on the resume, and also being considered as the best fighter for a spell VS being undefeated, consistent, many title defenses, but with a less stellar resume.

    Hard to say honestly. I would say that Finito was greater just due to the fact that he kept everything together in the long run, had the intangibles, remained unbeaten, and didn’t fold even when met with adversity (Rosendo Alvarez). But it would have helped if he had his share of facing other talented fighters within his weight class. Curry at least fought a defensive genius in Starling and a fast, slick Ali-type like LaRocca. Curry had hit a much higher plateau than Lopez, although Lopez remained great much longer.

    Skill wise I think they’re both really close as well. Curry showed much better infighting while Lopez had much better footwork. At their best they both looked close to flawless in terms of technique. Just beautiful style to watch. 2 fighters I greatly admire and also consider them the ideal textbook boxer-punchers.
     
    Jel and George Crowcroft like this.

Share This Page