Hector Camacho vs Vasyl Lomachenko

Discussion in 'Mythical Matchups' started by Flo-Raiden, Jun 5, 2025.

  1. Flo-Raiden

    Flo-Raiden Undisputed Champion

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2020
    Messages:
    2,250
    Likes Received:
    1,356
    Gender:
    Male
    @ 130 or 135. Two very gifted southpaws with speed and flash. Who do you think wins here?
     
  2. Xplosive

    Xplosive X-MOD Bad Motherfucker

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2003
    Messages:
    55,730
    Likes Received:
    13,295
    Location:
    Your girl's crib
    Camacho by commanding decision. Early-to-mid 80s Hector was plain and simple better than Loma ever was.

    Loma choked against a Camacho wannabe.
     
    Greynotsoold likes this.
  3. puerto rock

    puerto rock WBC Silver Diamond Emeritus Champ

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2003
    Messages:
    12,220
    Likes Received:
    1,475
    Camacho for sure. Loma wouldn’t be able to deal with the hand speed.
     
  4. Jesus of montreal

    Jesus of montreal WBC Silver Diamond Emeritus Champ

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2006
    Messages:
    12,966
    Likes Received:
    2,122
    I dont see it as a foregone conclusion at all. In fact,
    i would probaly lean toward Loma
     
  5. Xplosive

    Xplosive X-MOD Bad Motherfucker

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2003
    Messages:
    55,730
    Likes Received:
    13,295
    Location:
    Your girl's crib
    Loma on myth alone. Loma only on recency bias and the fact he's more liked.

    The reality is that Camacho has a deeper resume and a more dominant prime.
     
  6. whiskey

    whiskey Czarcasm

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2002
    Messages:
    47,346
    Likes Received:
    5,172
    Camacho liked doing that lame as multi-slap avalanche and then immediately clinch to make it look like it was the opponent holding. I don't think he would get away with that against Lomachenko.
     
    Double L likes this.
  7. Jesus of montreal

    Jesus of montreal WBC Silver Diamond Emeritus Champ

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2006
    Messages:
    12,966
    Likes Received:
    2,122

    Camacho is probably more overhyped than Loma. I liked the guy, but he was much more flash than substance. As much as we criticize Loma for his non performance against Lopez, Camacho had quite a few of these.

    Does Camacho really has a better resume than Loma? I'm far from sure. Both were lower greats for their respective generation. I dont see any real gap between them
     
    Last edited: Jun 17, 2025 at 9:10 PM
  8. Xplosive

    Xplosive X-MOD Bad Motherfucker

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2003
    Messages:
    55,730
    Likes Received:
    13,295
    Location:
    Your girl's crib
    I'll take wins over Limon, Ramirez, Rosario, Davis, Paz, Baltazar, and Haugen over Loma's incredibly thin resume. At least Camacho's best wins were over guys his size.

    Loma's career defining win came over a past-primmed 122 pounder.

    I dont know if Loma even beats Ramirez, I really dont. I'm VERY confident in saying that Loma gets stopped by Rosario.

    Even Howard Davis - Davis was a FUCK of a lot better than Haney; Camacho shut him (Davis) out. Loma has a close fight with Haney; yet conveniently still looks like vintage Loma when he beats up Bozos.

    Loma was a myth. Its awfully bold to pick him over the genuine article Camacho, when he a has a clear loss on his record to a rip off version of Camacho. And dont give me the excuse of "Ohhh but Teo has more power than Camacho" yeah yeah yeah.. Teo is shit. Teo never in a million years beats a prime Camacho.

    Nothing but excuses for Loma. The man did nothing to suggest he beats Camacho.
     
    Last edited: Jun 18, 2025 at 12:04 AM
  9. Neil

    Neil tueur de grenouilles

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2006
    Messages:
    37,617
    Likes Received:
    4,047
    Occupation:
    The Cal Ripken of Alcoholism
    Lomachenkos best weight was really 126

    His best win was there over Russell jr
     
  10. Xplosive

    Xplosive X-MOD Bad Motherfucker

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2003
    Messages:
    55,730
    Likes Received:
    13,295
    Location:
    Your girl's crib
    I disagree with this. I think his best weight was easily 130. That's the weight a matchup with Camacho would make the most sense at.

    Hector is a clear favorite at 135.

    For what its worth, I could see Loma potentially beating Hector at 130 before I could see him beating Floyd, Chavez, or Arguello at 130. I dont think Loma lasts the distance at 130 with those 3.
     
  11. whiskey

    whiskey Czarcasm

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2002
    Messages:
    47,346
    Likes Received:
    5,172
    Maybe not, but that's worthless. Camacho went into every fight lasting the distance. Loma if even in a losing effort wouldn't run and hold to get there.
     
  12. Xplosive

    Xplosive X-MOD Bad Motherfucker

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2003
    Messages:
    55,730
    Likes Received:
    13,295
    Location:
    Your girl's crib
    Camacho's best performance at 130 was a 5th round blow out. Its just objectively false to say he was always some safety first fighter.

    And Loma didn't have anywhere near the power of Rosario -- I dont think he would bring out Camacho's caution.

    I dont think you're giving Camacho nearly enough credit. He took an unholy beating from Chavez and hung in, even when he had no reason to. A lot of guys would have retired on their stools from the Chavez beating. Hell maybe even Loma would have.

    I do not believe for one second that Loma had some Matthew Saad/Holyfield level of heart and desire. He pissed away both the Lopez and Haney fights while failing to show any sense of urgency, so spare me.
     
  13. whiskey

    whiskey Czarcasm

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2002
    Messages:
    47,346
    Likes Received:
    5,172
    I'm saying lasting the distance doesn't mean much the way Camacho often did. Loma could have and should have done more, but in his decision losses they were very close and not routs.
     
    Xplosive and Jesus of montreal like this.
  14. Jesus of montreal

    Jesus of montreal WBC Silver Diamond Emeritus Champ

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2006
    Messages:
    12,966
    Likes Received:
    2,122

    Rethinking about it, you're right, Camacho has a much better resume than Loma. Still, he has too many struggles and close fights against very ordinary guys like Haugen, Paz and Mancini for me to discount Loma chances against him
     
  15. Jesus of montreal

    Jesus of montreal WBC Silver Diamond Emeritus Champ

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2006
    Messages:
    12,966
    Likes Received:
    2,122

    And yes, while it's true that Loma never faced anyone that was anywhere close as good as chavez, dlh or tito, Camacho was so pathetic in these fights, that I doubt Loma wouldnt have done better (even if he provably gets stoppes by all 3)
     
  16. Xplosive

    Xplosive X-MOD Bad Motherfucker

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2003
    Messages:
    55,730
    Likes Received:
    13,295
    Location:
    Your girl's crib
    I dont discount Loma against Camacho, but their career results do indicate that Camacho should be the favorite.

    This might sound controversial, but imo Loma was closer in level to prime Casamayor than he was prime Camacho.
     
  17. Double L

    Double L Book Reader

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2003
    Messages:
    28,657
    Likes Received:
    1,829
    How about camacho lasting the distance with Trinidad? Still, it's not like he's on a different level than Loma like you're suggesting. Camacho's sxhtick worked well against brawlers like Limon but guys with real skill usually put him in a shell.
     
  18. Neil

    Neil tueur de grenouilles

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2006
    Messages:
    37,617
    Likes Received:
    4,047
    Occupation:
    The Cal Ripken of Alcoholism
    Camacho also beat the shit out of Whitaker in the gym!
     

Share This Page