Godfather believes that hussein had connections to al-quaeda. If he can't understand the ZERO evidence to support that claim and he can't understand admin officials themselves saying there were no connections, then he is a stupid mother fuckerm, and couldn't handle much of any kind of evidence.
Didnt say you did, i said you could. You really need to learn how to read English. However, now that i think of it, it would really fit your M.O. A bunch of your posts were deleted mysteriously. But hey, its just an observation. Relax
Which form would you prefer. Queens , Creole , Ebonic , Pidgin ? :dunno: Regular old English I usually prefer. I POSED A QUESTION AND ANSWERED IT NO ... now maybe the meaning did not come over like it would in face to face conversation. But I obviously said NO HE DID NOT.
Well I'd love to continue this pointless tit for tat nitpicking fest that only serves to confuse the real issues , but I have a meeting to get to. You kids might want to go back and look at all the coincidences surrounding 9/11 and ask yourself what the odds could possible be for them all to occur around this event. My guess is there's less grains of sand on this earth.
You two have obviously never been anywhere near a high-security building in your lives, so you have absolutely no purpose arguing this point.
Actually, there was. It seemed fishy to me that you would put it that. I also know that you will go great lengths to prove you are right. You will never admit you are wrong. Your posts have been deleted, editing one of your own posts afterwards, isnt too far fetched. I have no evidence, so i cant prove it. But i have my theories.
You're wrong. They were not in charge up to Sept 10th. I have no clue where you are getting that. John O'Neill had about a month on the job. "Barry McDaniel, CEO of the company since January 2002, declines on security grounds to give specific details about work the company did at the World Trade Center. According to McDaniel, the contract was ongoing (a "completion contract"), and "not quite completed when the Center went down." The company designed a system, but; as he points out -- obviously that "didn't have anything to do with planes flying into buildings."... http://www.populist.com/03.02.burns.html They were designing some sort of system but were not in charge of security. They did not "hand it over to Kroll on Sept 10th. That is 100% false.
You posed a question then answered with a question. I stated that John O'Niell was the Head of Security @ the WTC not Marvin Bush. You said: Did he work for Marvin Bush's company called Securacom that had the security contract for the WTC's? No ? ... that's what I thought. You know exactly what you meant. Why would you say "that's what I thought" if you were basically agreeing with me?
Just like you will show us EVIDENCE that a passport can survive from a plane that exploded enough to pulverize the ENTIRE PLANE. The impact destroys large planes but doesn't destroy a passport, or if the passport was in the guys pocket, how does the guy get destroyed completely along with clothing but the passport remains recognizable. BULLSHIT
Neither one of these guys has ever been anywhere near a high security building, so anything that they say is complete bullshit.
I'm still waiting for Petre to give me a plausible explanation on how two of the biggest buildings in the world can be prepared for demolition without anyone knowing it. TFK
It's BS, hyperbolized comments like this that keep that conspiracy snowball rolling and getting bigger.. Petre is hands-down the most irresponsible person on here when it comes to replacing facts with bullshit.. This was just another example.. He also said that there was clear evidence of bombs, and witnesses claim to have seen bombs explode on the lower floors. Again, utter BS that he absolutely cannot indisputably back up..
You simply can't add 2+2 can you T ? You don't understand that even though Mad Dog commits the crime Fat Tony was the man in charge. AND once again you are the king of taking things ou t of context ... only now you do it right in the reference thread. I never said anyone saw a bomb go off :kick: ... I said they saw the evidence of it in the basement of the towers , (Which was WAY too far away from the crashes to do any damage ... also , many saw flashes happening all over the buildings in question and told the media the same. If you are going to resort to dishonesty in your debates then there's no point whatsoever in discussion.
I still don't understand how the buildings were supposed to have fallen... I mean.. gravity only works in one direction. LOL nevermind.. we've already witnessed Petre's complete lack of understanding of basic physics.
Your problem is that you don't understand beyond that basic law of physics. "Uhhhhhhhh .... Tings falll down ... errrrrrr ... heheheheh .... look , the pretty buillllding go booom . heheheheheh " zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz :kick:
