Pacquiao - Linares in 2008?!

Why are you on my nut sack lately? I already told you I didn't go to Steve_Dave about getting you canned. It's not my fault you go around using racial slurs towards people on this board. :dunno:

 

And its not my fault you lose sleep at night cos Manny got smashed by a boy named Sue.

 

No he didn't. He dropped that queer on the canvas 3 times and broke his nose.

 

And then what......:laughing: :laughing: :laughing:

 

Then fought in a pretty close fight where he was robbed by a judge who didn't know how to score round 1. People crack me up with the "JMM schooled Pacquiao" bullshit. Pacquiao won rounds 1 (10-6), 2,7,9,10. JMM won rounds 3-6, 11 and 12. I had 8 even. Even if you think JMM won there was no schooling after round 6. Rounds 7-12 were quite competitive.

 

because you said so right? dude if it wasn't for that flukie first round JMM wins a clear UD. The schooling came for the majority of rounds he won which he did.

The knockdowns made the scorecards close.

you should know this by now.

 

Yes because I said so. My opinion is more important to me than yours. You can say the same shit over and over but I don't see it that way. "If not for the first round", sorry but it was a 12 round fight. I don't want to here that lame shit because it don't matter. Pacquiao deserved to win the fight, hell ask 2 of the judges they agree.

 

MAB will do better than the first time. I can't see how he can do much worse. MAB is still MAB, he's no bum although his stamina has clearly taken a hit at 130 pounds. Regardless, this MAB is JMM's best win in his career, I wouldn't talk to much shit about him. :laughing:

 

:eeeek:

Someone just got ownt. ::

 

This sounds like what someone who doesn't know much about boxing might say.

Valdosta gives a round by round break down and LATIN QUEEN's only response consist of "If Fagquez didn't lay down on the canvas with his legs spread in the air 3 times, he would've won."

If Fagquez didn't finger asian trannies in the mouth, he might be straight as well. ::

 

your the same clown who thinks Floyd wouln't win a round against Paul williams. ::

how can you critize anybodie's boxing knowledge when you type stupid shit like that?:dunno: :laughing:

and there you go with the gay remarks which is all you can say when you don't have a boxing related response. :laughing:

 

go look at your thread about Floyd not winning a round against williams

everyone took turns with you with no vaseline.::

 

one of the judges had pacquiao winning by big gap. The other had Marquez winning by a big gap. One had it a draw.

so clearly all three saw a different fight. :dunno:

maybe if he hadn't wore cheap socks.:dunno:

 

I wasn't knocking MAB.

I was talking about what does it mean at this stage for Pacquiao to beat a guy coming of a loss that he already beat 3 years ago when he was closer to his prime.

Or will this be another mrales situation that no matter how many times he beats him the guy's value will never drop.:dunno:

I guess if Pacquiao fought MOrales next year it will still be considered a great win in your eyes right? :dunno:

:laughing:

 

Maybe he'd win a round, but I seriously doubt he'd win the fight,..a quick and nimble southpaw with heavyweight measurements who throws 1300+ punches over 12 rounds,...

Fraud has fought nobody anywhere near that description,...nor will that bitch ever,..he'll continue to beat opponents on paper, with your blessing .

 

MAB lost a competitive fight to JMM. When was his last loss before that? :dunno: It's not like MAB has become some loser. What does the fight mean? Well MAB said he wasn't prepared last time, maybe he will be this time. ::

 

and the judge who had it a draw openly admitted he fucked up after the fight. Like I said if you ask 2 of the 3 judges who won, they would say Pacquiao. :clap:

 

I can always say that Williams hasn't fought anybody like Floyd.

Fact is Floyd has fought and beaten different types of fighters on different weight classes. He has dominated the majority.

Williams beat Williams on close decision and he is ready for Floyd?:laughing:

 

Please! make the first round 10-6 and your boy still loses. :dunno:

 

:doh:

 

Fraud's just a skittish little shit who runs from corner to corner, Paul doesn't have to change his usual routine to pressure and throw thousands of punches,..but you tell me how Fraud is going to handle the height, reach, stance and workrate of Williams?.. we know Fraud's not knocking him out, we know Fraud's not fighting on the inside, we know Fraud's not going to outhustle or outwork him, all that's really left for Fraud is to try and pot the belly and run without being clipped by one of Williams timed flagpost arms,..but before that,..Fraud's got to try and get past the jab of the biggest reach this side of Nicolay Valuev,..and Fraud couldn't handle De La Hoya's staminaless little stump when he decided to throw it sporadically.

Fraud loses..but would never ever fight him,.... you and the rest of Fraud's groupies can feel empowered by awarding him another inexplicable victory on paper to 'da p4p champ' "who's Paul Williams?..he's not "worthy",...why not give Fraud a victory over Wlad while you're at it :dunno:..?

 

I never said Williams wouldn't be a problem for Floyd. Given his size and skill he is a proble for anybody at 147.

However his biggest advantage over Margarito aside from the reach was the speed. He was faster than Margarito and beat him to the punch. that is until Margarito slowed his ass down late in the fight.

Against Floyd he wouldn't have that speed advantage. Floyd is still faster and more skilled than Williams. Not to mention more proven.

Another thing as big as Williams is he is not a huge puncher. so let's not pretend he is the new Tommy Hearns at 147::

and you mentioned Oscar's sucess with the jab against floyd. Yeah but you forgot to mentioned that he suddenly stopped throwing it. Oscar's excuse was that "it wasn't the night of the jab" ::

actually Floyd countered the shit out of him all night till he stopped throwing it.

All Wiliams has over Floyd is size but the power doesn't match that size nor does he have the skill or speed over Floyd.

I know you hyped Margarito like hell so of course now you jumped into the closest anti Floyd bandwagon called williams. :stir:

 

You say 'speed advantage'..that doesn't matter much when Williams OWNS the range and would control it by timing a back pedling Fraud with his long and frequent jab, Fraud could shimmy and dance and look real fly with that illegal shoulder roll shit, but one prod to the nose thrown from the other side of the ring, beats all that twisting, turning, running, and hitting air. With the amount of punches Williams throws, coupled with vast advantages of reach and height, Williams will hit Fraud alot more than Fraud will be able to hit Williams,..which should more or less equate to a decision victory.

BOTH Williams and Margarito would come at Fraud for 12 rounds like big thrashing machines,..and although Margarito's propellers are slower,..:crafty: they're sharper blades,..so really it's up to Fraud who beats his arse,.. Ken? or Ryu?..:crafty: my guess is that he walks out of the arcade to go start some fires and wet the bed like a true psychopath.

 

Not in the judges eyes and more importantly not in mine. Pacquiao won. :clap:

 

Why do you hate Marquez, Valdosta? Sometimes I wonder if it's not more about Latin King than Marquez....

I just don't understand why you, Tam and Alabama man hate the guy so much. He's a class act, he's very good, he can be very entertaining despite what you've said in the past (Yawn), he's tough... Basically, he's what you want a boxer to be. No matter what happened in the fight against Pacquiao, there's nothing to hate about Marquez.:dunno:

 

he's a homosexual, though.

 

So what? We don't watch him fuck, we watch him fight. I couldn't care less about his sexual preferences.

 

I know, I was just saying that that's the reason why some posters hate him.

 

Not valid.:nono: