Could any fighter, post 1987 have been able to...

Discussion in 'Mythical Matchups' started by slystaff, Dec 17, 2007.

  1. slystaff

    slystaff Im Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2003
    Messages:
    15,331
    Likes Received:
    1
    even hang competitively with Hagler, Leonard and Hearns?

    You really wouldn't think so listening to some of the shit that is spewed by the elitists on this forum.

    I guess boxing had declined DRAMATICALLY since the turn of the 90s decade...and now I'm hearing that Mayweather would have had no chance against Tito....so we're in an even further decline in the 2000. :lol: Boxing must be in a sad state indeed.





    or some of you gentlemen need help....
     
    slystaff, Dec 17, 2007
    #1
  2. Erratic

    Erratic "Twinkle Toes" McJack

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2003
    Messages:
    9,211
    Likes Received:
    960
    Occupation:
    Professional Bum
    Home Page:
    Michael Nunn gives a prime Marvin Hagler a competitive bout, and Bernard Hopkins beats him.
     
    Erratic, Dec 17, 2007
    #2
  3. ghoster

    ghoster Leap-Amateur

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2006
    Messages:
    177
    Likes Received:
    0
    Home Page:

    ?????????? Nunn? A younger Hagler walks through Nunn. Hopkins would be tougher but Hagler still wins!
     
    ghoster, Dec 17, 2007
    #3
  4. Xplosive

    Xplosive X-MOD Bad Motherfucker

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2003
    Messages:
    56,690
    Likes Received:
    13,754
    Location:
    Your girl's crib
    RJ woulda beaten Hagler. Possibly Hopkins as well.

    DLH woulda been competitive with Leonard, and Hearns, but he loses to both.

    Tito woulda had a punchers chance vs Hearns, but its more likely that Tommy blows him away early.

    Leonard vs Trinidad would be a one sided ass whuppin.
     
    Xplosive, Dec 17, 2007
    #4

Share This Page