According to Ricardo Lois, Boxing Confidential. It had been rumored by the website that it was going to take place on the Pacquiao-Marquez II card.
Arthur looked terrible in his last fight....he does have problem making the weight and perhaps overlooked Stephen Foster
nah, he's looked impressive against some good European opposition.....everyone thought the Foster fight was a mismatch, and as it has done before in his career...caplency could have krept in.....his weight making trouble is genuine, and without the motivation that a big fight brings, he probably struggled more so than usual Don't get me wrong....Arthur at his best or worst loses to Guzman...and loses comfortably.....the Arthur that fought Foster would get KOd pretty early....the Arthur that beat Sinitsin, Gulyakevich and Gogoladze would give a decent account of himself...and would lose big on points or by late stoppage
Arthur at his best would give a good account of himself- he's a tough, solid and fundamentally sound little b*stard but he's not beating Guzman. Not even with three hands...
I have seen Arthur fight several times. He hits a bit harder than Guzman but that's it. No other advantages. He's easy to hit and outbox.
:doh: ......it is always worth double checking....i guess i thought that rule didn't apply to me....i have become a victim of my own misspelt word (which obviously was complacency)....i guess that makes me the the Alex Arthur of posting