"My friends, we live in the greatest nation in the history of the world. I hope you'll join with me as we try to change it to Islam." - Barack Hussein Bin Osama Evil will not permanently triumph. Antichrist, vain in his blasphemy and cruel in his oppression, will more than meet his match when the three and one-half years of his moral and political debauchery are ended. The Lord will consume him "with the spirit of his mouth" and "with the brightness of his coming" (2 Thessalonians 2:8) Glory days are almost upon us, rejoice! :laughing:
I am astounded that u believe the above nonsense Petre. U r sinking faster than I thought. Many months ago u were improving now u r regressing. Where did it all go wrong ???
Oh no doubt, that article is utterly ridiculous. All the shit about Islam, extreme left wing etc is a load of bollocks from the Republican right. Look, Umbongo is a good orator who is playing the game like every other cunt politician. He's no saviour of the fucking world like some may believe, he's a politician just like the rest, no better nor worse really. What's attractive to many is his freshness. Personally I hope he becomes President just to piss off every racist cunt in the USA (like half the US population, ). A by-product is that he may even do a better job than Bush. He surely can't be worse. My wagon is firmly hitched to Umbongo.:cheer:
I'm guessing most of you that addressed me , have your BB and / or HTML code turned off , which is why you didn't notice the points in the article that I highlighted , to which I agree ... Here , let me help. No where in my post did I say I agreed with everything in the article ... I said
One of the parts that was highlighted was about our healthcare, in which it said that americas was the strongest in the world? What does that mean? Shouldn't we want a good healthcare system? what the fuck is a "strong"health care???? And as for national security, what obama will or won't do is pure guess work, on the part of his supporters and opponents. And of course, voting in america is purely symbolic and means NOTHING in the overall scheme of things.
You mustn't try to cite Bible when I'm around unless you really know it and are representing it properly. NO WHERE in the Bible does it refer to a specific man as THE anti-christ. That's a myth started in "The Omen" films Of Muslim descent? Where in scripture? ::
the book of revelations was for the jews in ancient time, so don't bring that anti-christ bullshit without strong proof. That being said, obama is not the answer for today's problems. he's just more trouble
Here's my answer to that apocalypse-hysteria bullshit Preterist view Preterism holds that the contents of Revelation constitute a prophecy of events that were fulfilled in the 1st century.<sup id="cite_ref-15" class="reference">[16]</sup> Preterist interpretations generally identify either Jerusalem or Pagan Rome as the persecutor of the Church, "Babylon", the "Mother of Harlots", etc. They see Armageddon as God's judgment on the Jews, carried out by the Roman army, which is identified as "the beast". Some preterists see the second half of Revelation as changing focus to Rome, its persecution of Christians, and the fall of the Roman Empire. It sees the Revelation being fulfilled in 70, thereby bringing the full presence of God to dwell with all humanity. It also holds, especially in the Catholic belief, that the Emperor Nero, who blamed the Rome fire on the Christians in Rome, sparking a wave of persecution, was possibly the Antichrist mentioned in the book as his name equals 666 in Hebrew.<sup id="cite_ref-16" class="reference">[17]</sup> If using the Greek spelling of Nero's name(Neron Caesar), but using the Hebrew symbols with their assigned numeric values (an ancient method known as gematria), the total of the numeric values equals 666. However, a few ancient manuscripts of the Revelation say the number is 616, fifty less than the more well known numeral. A possible method to this problem lies in early translation. In the assumption that the Revelation was meant to be distributed among the early Christians, it could very well be assumed that occasionally someone may have used the Latin spelling of Nero's name(Nero Caesar), so the total value of the gematria would be 616.<sup id="cite_ref-17" class="reference">[18]</sup><sup id="cite_ref-18" class="reference">[19]</sup> Catholics generally believe chapters 11:19 to 12:18 are the true story of the Journey to Ephesus (and then later to Heaven) of the Virgin Mary (who they believe is the Second ark of the Covenant), and a possible metaphor for the plight of the early church.<sup class="noprint Template-Fact">[citation needed]</sup> All that remains for Catholic preterists is Christ's second coming.<sup class="noprint Template-Fact">[citation needed]</sup> Another view of the book of Revelation is known as Partial Preterism. This view, much like modern dispensationalism, splits end-times prophecy into multiple parts. Whereas in some of the many varieties of dispensationalism, part of the Book of Revelation is literal where as other parts are figurative, Partial-Preterism does the same and holds Matthew 24 to be partially speaking of the fall of Jerusalem in 70, where as other parts are fulfilled at the final return of Christ.<sup class="noprint Template-Fact">[citation needed]</sup>
First off ... I did not cite anything ... That was written by the articles author and I did not highlight it as a relevant point. Secondly , I don't argue bible. That's for amutuer's that know just enough about the bible to thump it inaccurately while subsequently making themselves look foolish and acting contrary to scripture ... but I'll guarantee you this .... when ever I do cite scripture , you can be sure , I'll present a proper case for my interpretation , and I won't have to worry about anyone correcting me.
Cool...I sit rebuked. I have alot of respect for your Biblical knowledge (as well as other stuff) and that's why I was surprised that you'd have that nonsense in a post. Glad to find out that you don't share that viewpoint.
a lot in that article is sad but true.. Obama has shown no substance! I don't think he or Clinton will win and I sure hope they don't. I pay enough taxes as is!
This is my problem with Obama as well , no substance. And what he does put forth in various policies and ideas ... he's wrong on just about everything. If Obama had the knowledge and history of Paul , and was determined to make the very real changes Paul proposed , I'd be a strong supporter. But what I see is a phony, smooth talking , do nothing or do the wrong thing , shyster. And for any of you religiously inclined here ... (Like 2 of his biggest supporters) ... I suggest you look up Obama's stance on partial birth abortion and more importantly , his history on it. It's appalling , and I say this as someone neither for nor against abortion under the right circumstances.
You never presented a proper case for prophecy, and you were corrected on this by several people because it boils down to what you want to believe ::
CHANGE :: it will change for sure.. Obama and clinton both will repeal the bushy tax cuts and on top of that raise taxes to pay for their health care plans
Presenting a proper case doesn't mean there wouldn't be opposition. And I certainly was never corrected. I was given an opposing opinion ... one that has in fact been proven wrong , but foolish pride prevents those that cling to their theory from seeing the truth.
You were corrected in that it is your interpretation and has not been fullfilled, nothing to do with any facts or truth, THAT is a fact :clap:
OK, how much "change" will that entail? Will I actually notice it? By how much if I notice it, will it be?
Prophesy is always open to interpretation until clearly fulfilled ... and in fact I presented clear cut reason why it could not have been. That is a fact.
When you see the OBAMAnation that causes desolation standing where it does not belong RUN MOTHER FUCKER RUN !!!! :: The people of the ruler who will come will destroy the city and the sanctuary. The end will come like a flood: War will continue until the end, and desolations have been decreed. He [The OBAMANATION now referred to as Antichrist] will confirm a covenant with many for one 'seven.' In the middle of the 'seven' he [Antichrist] will put an end to sacrifice and offering. And on a wing of the temple he [Antichrist] will set up an OBAMAnation that causes desolation, until the end that is decreed is poured out on him [Antichrist] His armed forces will rise up to desecrate the temple fortress and will abolish the daily sacrifice. Then they will set up the OBAMAnation that causes desolation. With flattery (i.e. smooth talkin shystin) he will corrupt those who have violated the covenant, but the people who know their God will firmly resist him. Those who are wise will instruct many "The king will do as he pleases. He will exalt and magnify himself above every god and will say unheard-of things against the God of gods. He will be successful until the time of wrath is completed, for what has been determined must take place. He will show no regard for the gods of his fathers or for the one desired by women, nor will he regard any god, but will exalt himself above them all ============== The Roof ... THE ROOF .... THE ROOF IS ON FIRE ... WE DON'T NEED NO WATER LET THE MOTHER FUCKER BURN! <object height="419" width="518"> <embed src="http://www.eyeblast.tv/public/FlashPlayerLight.swf" flashvars="videos=http://media.eyeblast.org/resources/2036.flv&xmlfile=http://www.eyeblast.tv/Public/xml/NoThumbs.xml&thumb=Http://media.eyeblast.org/thumbs/1741.jpg&auto=0" wmode="window" allowscriptaccess="sameDomain" allowfullscreen="true" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" height="419" width="518"></object>
C'mon Petre. I know Obama is a horrible choice for President and will make bad things much worse, but The Anti-Christ? Gimme a break. TFK