Nate Campbell vs A prime Stevie Johnston

Discussion in 'Mythical Matchups' started by Xplosive, Jul 1, 2008.

  1. Xplosive

    Xplosive X-MOD Bad Motherfucker

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2003
    Messages:
    55,491
    Likes Received:
    13,171
    Location:
    Your girl's crib
    Who wins?
     
    Xplosive, Jul 1, 2008
    #1
  2. Jake

    Jake WBC Silver Diamond Emeritus Champ

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2003
    Messages:
    10,066
    Likes Received:
    2
    Gender:
    Male
    Home Page:
    Stevie... by a lot.

    Nate's my boy, but he's rapidly becoming the most overrated fighter in recent boxing history (this thread has nothing to do with it, by the way).
     
    Jake, Jul 2, 2008
    #2
  3. Xplosive

    Xplosive X-MOD Bad Motherfucker

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2003
    Messages:
    55,491
    Likes Received:
    13,171
    Location:
    Your girl's crib
    I agree. Post-Diaz, people have been talking about Nate like he's the second coming of Pryor.
     
    Xplosive, Jul 2, 2008
    #3
  4. joony

    joony "Twinkle Toes" McJack

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2003
    Messages:
    7,788
    Likes Received:
    0
    Home Page:
    no one's overrating campbell. many would suggest that he beats casamayor, pac and just about anyone in the 135 lb weight class.

    that's not a stretch by anyone's imagination. i certainly think he could beat those guys at 135 although it could easily be the other way around.

    now, if folks were to say that he would streamroll through the 140 pound weight class, that's a different story.

    anyhow, johnston wins on points.
     
    joony, Jul 2, 2008
    #4
  5. Neil

    Neil tueur de grenouilles

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2006
    Messages:
    37,203
    Likes Received:
    3,952
    Occupation:
    The Cal Ripken of Alcoholism
    johnston
     
    Neil, Jul 2, 2008
    #5
  6. Jake

    Jake WBC Silver Diamond Emeritus Champ

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2003
    Messages:
    10,066
    Likes Received:
    2
    Gender:
    Male
    Home Page:
    well, if he's not overrated now, then he was grossly underrated prior to March. because prior to then, he wasn't a blip on anyone's radar

    Until he develops an established reign @ 135, his win over Diaz isn't really much more than, say Zab beating Spinks the 2nd time around - one night of finally putting it altogether in a career otherwise filled with disappointment,
     
    Jake, Jul 3, 2008
    #6
  7. Xplosive

    Xplosive X-MOD Bad Motherfucker

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2003
    Messages:
    55,491
    Likes Received:
    13,171
    Location:
    Your girl's crib
    Do you think he'll beat Guzman?
     
    Xplosive, Jul 3, 2008
    #7
  8. Jake

    Jake WBC Silver Diamond Emeritus Champ

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2003
    Messages:
    10,066
    Likes Received:
    2
    Gender:
    Male
    Home Page:
    no
     
    Jake, Jul 16, 2008
    #8
  9. Rubio MHS

    Rubio MHS Undisputed Champion

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2005
    Messages:
    4,464
    Likes Received:
    3
    Nate Campbell's inconsistent. I wouldn't be surprised if in his current form, he lost to the Stevie Johnston of 2003.
     
    Rubio MHS, Jul 17, 2008
    #9
  10. Tam Tam

    Tam Tam "Twinkle Toes" McJack

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2006
    Messages:
    8,576
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Six Feet Below Where You Walk
    Home Page:
    Any fighter who moves has always given shit to Campbell. Nate's a bum.
     
    Tam Tam, Jul 17, 2008
    #10

Share This Page