Unicorn is a fierce animal? :kick:I guess if you believe that you can believe anything.....like training a T-rex who will abide by the crib
You're so full of shit that your eyes are brown.:boohoo: You haven't even read the rest of the passage as usual. I think you go on more bible sites than I do, but that's a good thing.
It says Unicorn many times in many "Bibles" :atu: You are the one full of shit to think it is a damn dinosaur :doh:
I have three bibles and none of them say unicorn. If you read the description of the animal mentioned, you would know that it probably isn't a unicorn that is being described.
I showed you which "Bibles" do have it, I don't know what point you are making.....but clearly there are many versions of this piece of work out there and they are WRONG which would be my point to dismiss any inerrancy you WISH it had. If it "probably isn't a Unicorn" it sure as FUCK isn't a damn dinosaur ::
The point is, as with any response to you, is that you only read a few lines and "go here, give me answers". You obviously can read, but as for comprehension, that is something you need to pray for.
You dodged the fundamental concept of innerancy once again. The reason it is edited out to "Ox" or any other animal other than "Unicorn" is because you people have to defend this nonsense.....so you REWRITE history with the "NEW" King James version :atu:
They could EASILY throw some BS term like dinosaur in there and then come back and say that the Bible mentions dinosaurs and tell the the world Bible has dinosaurs in them? The difficulty in translation and lack of definite word proves that they didn't fabricate and make it up like you wish and hope happened. :hammert:
You have many translations, that means innerancy? There are CLEAR different quotes from Mark to Mathew from Jesus on the same event, but that is innerancy? God doesn't do very good citation, or man doesn't take very good dictation, either way you are FAWKED when it comes to innerancy or a reason to claim it. God made a book that needs interpretation and translation from many perspectives that disagree with each other, he failed :dunno:
:: First you say the stories are made up, now you are going over translation with a fine tooth comb? Mark, Matthew, John and Luke are 4 different people who wrote about the same events. So much for Plagarism right there. There are some quotes that differ slightly, but takes nothing away from the dialogue that took place and the message it is intended to leave us. If one translation says Eve at the apple and another one says Eve ate the fruit, how are both wrong? They aren't.
:boohoo: Andrew, You couldn't equate your thoughts, so you decided to use google image search and look for some image that you think would make a good "argument".ld: I read all kinds of garbage like that yet no one seems to have an answer for anything:atu: I guess you are just another one in that category.
Looks like the picture hit a nerve :: Says the guy who had multiple google image search images in his sig for numerous months. Nice one :doh:
With the way atomicdogg and Tyler follow me around begging for answers, I want to ask Cupey for a religion forum. I started this thread and as usual Tyler took it fft:
well.. this is one thing we agree on.. I think we should have a religion section, it always comes up and if you had a section for it.. no one could get offended, if they dont want to talk/debate.. dont go in the religion forum
could be too hard for him, afterall hes spammed the board with "hottest chick" threads when theres already a forum for it. http://www.fightbeat.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=15
it is lucky for joke king that sheer, unadulterated stupidity is not considered a sin. he has already fell from God's good graces due to the gluttony thing.
I posted the last new thread on there and was within the last few responses there. :atu:You're just another fairy as evidenced by your calling a thread about hot chicks spam:doh:
I never thought I'd say this but the atheists have officially become more annoying then the bible beaters. :shit:
They are not the word of God, very simple point that you can't seem to grasp with two hands.....made up, inconsistencies, incorrect translations, multiple translations, open for misinterpretation, and contradictions does not equal omnipotent or innerant anything....
This thread was DEAD, I brought it back to life and I am not even God. You FAILED at this thread from the start, that munchkin isn't "most" anything :nono:
No one is saying she isn't fuckable, you are the MORON who is saying she is the "most"....facts are facts, you made yourself look new to observing the opposite sex, so who is gay here? ::
She is a munchkin. Gay people usually do project their tendencies unto heterosexuals, and your newness to the female species is proof positive you are a flamer