PBF who beat Corrales @130 vs. Pacquiao who beat JMM in re:

Discussion in 'Mythical Matchups' started by Double L, Jul 31, 2009.

  1. Double L

    Double L Book Reader

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2003
    Messages:
    28,632
    Likes Received:
    1,822
    Some of PBF's toughest competition came at 130 where he seemed willing to fight anyone (Chavez, Corrales, Hernandez).

    And Pacquiao, while he looked great against Hatton at 140, probably fought his toughest competition, at least thus far, at 130 (JMM, Morales).

    So who wins here? PBF was a large guy at 130 who muscled around a lot of his opposition.

    Pacquiao seemed to have the power, on the other hand, to KO almost anyone at 130.

    Who do you think would've won this fight? At 130? Had the two shared the 130 pound division?
     
    Double L, Jul 31, 2009
    #1
  2. Xplosive

    Xplosive X-MOD Bad Motherfucker

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2003
    Messages:
    55,654
    Likes Received:
    13,255
    Location:
    Your girl's crib
    Floyd without ANY doubt in my mind.
     
    Xplosive, Jul 31, 2009
    #2
  3. ILLUMINATI

    ILLUMINATI Roberto Duran

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2002
    Messages:
    33,900
    Likes Received:
    1,386
    Mayweather.....8-4
     
    ILLUMINATI, Jul 31, 2009
    #3
  4. steve_dave

    steve_dave Hard As Fuck

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2002
    Messages:
    30,692
    Likes Received:
    4
    Mayweather, clearly. Pac is always strong early, but Floyd dominates mid to late. Floyd was significantly better than JMM.
     
    steve_dave, Jul 31, 2009
    #4
  5. ghoster

    ghoster Leap-Amateur

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2006
    Messages:
    177
    Likes Received:
    0
    Home Page:
    Pacman for me, mainly because he's a southpaw(there's a reason Mayweather avoids the unorthodox stance). And also because at 130 I think Marquez could had done as good against Corrales as Mayweather did.
     
    ghoster, Aug 14, 2009
    #5

Share This Page