A - wins in impressive fashion or by knock-out B - wins decisively, if not impressively, or loses, but looks impressive (exciting fight; closely contested) C - wins but it's close and forgettable, or loses decisively D - wins but it's very close and could've gone either way, or loses by way of pussy-footing F - loses in humiliating fashion or gets KTFO or wins but doesn't deserve to win All fights at 147: PBF/Napoles PBF/JL Lopez PBF/Margarito - all plastered up PBF/Pacquiao PBF/Trinidad PBF/Duran PBF/Hearns PBF/Basilio PBF/Whitaker PBF/Benitez PBF/SRL PBF/SRR PBF/LaMotta PBF/Quartey PBF/Fullmer D, B, F, F, D, F, F, A, D, D, F, F, C, D, C Wow. PBF must be G.O.A.T.
Where is the option for him getting KTFO?????:warning: Seriously PBF is a waste of a thread unless it has to do with him fighting Manny Pac.
where the hell would you get that idea? i think it's pretty clear i'm interested in what grade people would give PBF for his performance (as you envision it) against each of the fighters listed. it's one thing to say he'd beat them all. or lose to half of them. it's another to say how good he'd look doing it. that's what i'm interested in.
