Amir Khan vs. Tommy Hearns at 147

I think Khan's incredible athleticism is simply too much for an intimidated and badly outgunned Hearns who lacks the boxing skills to handle that speed, the power to hurt Khan or the chin to take Khan's monstrous punchesissed:issed:issed:

he's unbeatable... he just beat an old guy with no courage and a ten-cent chin... can't be beat, ya'll

 

Hearns KO 1

 

Pick 'em. Chinny or not, boxing has evolved and Khan is a step up in skill and athleticism from the guys Tommy fought.

 

Hearns KO 1

 

Khoward has enough ability to drag it out say five or six rounds.

 

Two sharp punchers with shaky chins. Hearns had the edge in power while Khan is faster. It could turn either way, I would make Tommy perhaps 60:40 the favorite

 

What a troll topic.

 

they're so evenly matched, i'm having a tough time deciding.. i think i may have to go with a draw

 

its evolved a long way, clearly

Hearns looks primitive compared to the multi-faceted Marcos Maidana

 

why?

the evolutionary differences are monstrous

Hearns was from the 1980s

they didnt even have the world wide web back then

 

Yawn. Why are you so bootytickled about this whole thing?

 

about what?

don't you agree that Khan would be the best guy Hearns ever fought?

 

Khan learned from Zab so he would take out Hearns Brooklyn style

 

Hearns ain't got no street cred, yo

 

Hearns KO 1 after the first right hand he lands.

 

On second take, I may just be favoring Hearns because he's "old school" .. a realistic and objective examination yields that Khan is the superior fighter, he'd probably KO Hearns in 1 or 2 rounds.

 

Evolution:bears: