dsimon writes: I mean at this point in their careers, by comparison, Nando was considered quite good and when he lost to Tito he was at a crossroads. Many people had 20 20 hindsight and said he had been protected, yada yada yada.... And the rest is history. Like Miguel Nando was talented and could hit. Like Miguel his conditioning was at times mecurial. Like Miguel a lot of people will no doubt comment on how Miguel should proceed at this point. Opinions? PS: Cotto has nothing to be ashamed of and fought a great fight. I hope this fight was not his waterloo.
