Eubank vs Taylor

Discussion in 'Mythical Matchups' started by Xplosive, Dec 5, 2008.

  1. Xplosive

    Xplosive X-MOD Bad Motherfucker

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2003
    Messages:
    55,554
    Likes Received:
    13,218
    Location:
    Your girl's crib
    160, or 168 either one. Who wins?
     
  2. Jake

    Jake WBC Silver Diamond Emeritus Champ

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2003
    Messages:
    10,066
    Likes Received:
    2
    Gender:
    Male
    Home Page:
    I think it's safe to say we've run of out MW's and SMW's to match up against Eubank :lol:... this is at least the third current CE thread that was discussed as as recent as a year ago.

    Anyway, my answer is same as it ever was - this fight clearly comes down to where it takes place. Eubank wins a decision anywhere in the UK, Taylor anywhere in the US.

    A better fight at 160, as a 168 lb. matchup would produce a boring chess match. Judge's scorecards aside, I'd probably have Eubank winning the fight regardless of weight and location.
     
  3. slystaff

    slystaff Im Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2003
    Messages:
    15,331
    Likes Received:
    1
    word.
     
  4. Free Ike

    Free Ike WBC Silver Diamond Emeritus Champ

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    10,242
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    None
    Location:
    Jake's Rule Violations: 3.5
    Eubank was a decent fighter. Taylor is not. Eubank wins by decision anywhere. Honestly, JT is so overrated. I look at his victories over Hopkins as a two headed monster. One, Hopkins has perhaps the worst level of opposition for an "ATG" ever. Two, he choked. I felt he lost both fights close, but more he lost them than Taylor won.

    If Hopkins had fought the likes of Watson, Mccallum, Benn, Collins, Mccallum, JONES(who he lost to0, Toney, Hopkins would not be a fucking blip on the radar. Amazing, what DLH is attempting to do tomorrow, beating up a skilled but smaller man is what Bhop did his entire career with a few, or one, exception liek Tarver. Please stop overrating JT. Eubank was far better. You guy are just to Jingoistic and "Teenyboppers."
     
  5. Xplosive

    Xplosive X-MOD Bad Motherfucker

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2003
    Messages:
    55,554
    Likes Received:
    13,218
    Location:
    Your girl's crib
    Outta all those you listed other than Jones(who already beat him) the only ones who woulda had a chance at beating Hopkins are McCallum, and Toney. Hopkins would've beaten the living hell outta Eubank, Benn, Collins, and Watson.. you must know this deep down inside.
     
  6. Free Ike

    Free Ike WBC Silver Diamond Emeritus Champ

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    10,242
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    None
    Location:
    Jake's Rule Violations: 3.5
    No he wouldn't. Sorry, Hopkins never beat fighters as decent as Benn as middleweight. That's a fact. Probably the best fighter he fought at 160, who was a middleweight was Taylor and he lost twice. Hopkins gets credit for beating Wright, Tito and DLH who were all at least one entire weight class below him so what. I think you are assuming a lit. Please name one fighter Hops defeated at 160 who is better than any of the fighters I listed. The best Victory Hopkins had was against Tarver.

    Eubank held his own at Cruiser. If Hopkins thought Echols could crack, wtf would he do with Benn's power. Hopkins is lucky he dominated the weakest middleweight division ever. Just name one fighter at 160 Better than any of the fighters I listed. @ 160.
     
  7. ArturoGatti

    ArturoGatti WBC Silver Diamond Emeritus Champ

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2002
    Messages:
    16,580
    Likes Received:
    171
    Home Page:
    Eubank.

    Who do you think wins between Taylor and Benn? That would surely be a more exciting fight.
     

Share This Page