I'm inclined to say Eubank too after watching the Pavlik fight. But I must remind myself to be careful with these knee-jerk reactions. In a MYTHICAL MATCHUP based on the Pavlik, Spinks and Ouma fights, Bernard Hopkins...pre-Tarver, knocks Taylor out! But of course..we know that this didn't happen. So onto Eubank... Michael Watson gave him hell twice and almost beat him and IMO...Watson wasn't as good a fighter as Taylor overall. Sure Watson had better "D" than taylor and a more polished and professional style...but Watson wasn't particularly fast...didn't hit as hard as Taylor...didn't have a great chin himself and was just solid but not spectacular in any category. Dan Sherry was beating Eubank too and of couse Steve COllins had his number. i Think Taylor wins a decision...
WTF? Your acting as if Taylor is still a prospect. He's fought Hopkins twice, Wright, and Pavlik. Hell thats 3 better fighters than anyone on Eubank's resume. Who do we not know enough about Taylor?
this myth forum is plagued byy 1 major azz-hole - Rubio "miserable man." no topic is worthy of his consideration. fine. keep his fucking mouth shut. but he's gotta comment on every match-up? !!! guy gets to me - he's such an azz, isn't he?
Pavlik > Benn, Watson & Collins? I couldn't say for certain that any of these three are true at this stage of Kelly's career, though I'd expect him to eclipse both Collins and Watson in due course...
I'm the only one keeping this shithole section alive, because I'm the only one who can piece together these shitty topics. I even picked your butt-buddy in the "Castillo vs. Mancini" topic.
