It's GOTTA B Joe Lauzon or Nate Diaz... Nate Diaz Doesn't have a Trace of Facial Hair & he has the Adult Equivalent of a 13 Year Old's Body...EXTREMELY Gangly, Devoid of ANY Definition or Muscletone...Nate DOESN'T Even have those Skinny Man Muscles (ala Tommy Hearns @ Welterweight)...He's LITERALLY Built like a MALNOURISHED, UNDERdeveloped Teen Aged Boy:: ... Then there's Lauzon, who Actually LOOKS about 13 in the Face w/DUMBO Ears:: ... w/Guys like Wanderlai Silva, Clay Guida or Andrei Arlovski, U KNOW They're FIGHTERS just by Looking @ them... REED is Willing to Bet that PART of what Makes Nate Diaz Sooooo TOUGH is his LOOK...LOTS of Guys Probably STARTED Shit w/him, Cause he LOOKS like an Easy Mark... REED
joe lauzon def doesnt look like a fighter but the kid is a tough motherfucker tim silvia doesnt look like a fighter
Nate Diaz is as tough as they come. I guess its from all of those years getting his ass kicked by his big brother. BTW... Fedor gets my vote. Looks like a fat plumber.
Dont think MMA guys are as much your typical 'hard men' as boxers TBH. Boxers are all probably the guys who RAN their schools and their neighbourhoods. MMA guys look more like the guys who weren't that tough but were decent at sports and got into grappling. at college or late high school.
BJ penn doesnt really look like a fighter, sans the cauliflower ear, but the man is smooth as shit meanwhile sean sherk looks like the prototype of a fighter
Exactly. He just looks like a roided up little freak, he doesn't look tough at all. Who would you be more intimidated by if you bumped into them in a dark alley, Sherk or Hopkins?
