Pernell Whitaker vs. Mike McCallum @ 154

Does Whitaker do a similar job like Kalambay did or is he just too small?

 

Whitaker doesn't have the mobility or reach @ 154 to bother McCallum.

Sure he could win some rounds and provide and awkward target but he gets outpointed handily.

 

Pea by MD. - Cdogg

 

... but the judge who scored it even was on the take

 

LOL, assholes

No, I'd have to favor McCallum by decision here, 8-4 or 7-5 type of thing... this would be an opponent just too big for him

He'd still beat Terry Norris's fake, totally ungreat ass though

 

McCallum wins EASILY!

 

Not saying I'd favour Whitaker, but I think people would hesitate to pick against hima little more if we'd seen more than one single outing at this weight.

 

perhaps, but JC Vazquez, though a very solid fighter, was no Mike McCallum and I think Whitaker is the greatest lightweight who ever lived