Thomas Hearns vs. Joe Calzaghe @168

Who wins? A past his prime and optimal weight, all-time great Tommy Hearns? Or a WBOgus paper titlist, "never-did-shit," big-mouth, scared pussy Calzaghe?

 

Joe beats him on workrate and outpoints him ...

 

because i want it in writing the fact that Hearns would've handed Slappy his ass.

 

are you saying he's not a pussy? and that the proof is my starting a thread about him?

sorry, but if he wants to disprove his pussydom he's going to have to do better than Peter Manfredo.

actually, at this point, the only way Calzaghe redeems himself is to be on the receiving end of a decisive beating. he's lied to the public for too long.

 

I would pick Herans if this was p4p or if Joe had fought at lighter weights and the fight was posted at the lighter weight.
However the older Hearns at 167 would get outpointed by slappy ..

 

How about the Hearns at age 28 that won a middleweight title?

Let's say he only goes up one division instead of two.

 

Yeah but now I have to guess at what Calzaghe would look like at 160 ..