Who will go down as greater/better: Bud or Loma

Discussion in 'General Boxing Discussion' started by Xplosive, Dec 1, 2021.

  1. Xplosive

    Xplosive X-MOD Bad Motherfucker

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2003
    Messages:
    55,554
    Likes Received:
    13,218
    Location:
    Your girl's crib
    What say yall?

    I guess its premature to say who will go down as greater. It depends on how the rest of their careers play out.

    Better? I've always said and maintained that Crawford is a better fighter than Loma.

    I think Bud has more substance as a fighter, and more gears to shift into.

    For all the "he's downloading" bullshit, I also think Bud's ring IQ is higher.
     
  2. Neil

    Neil tueur de grenouilles

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2006
    Messages:
    37,341
    Likes Received:
    3,988
    Occupation:
    The Cal Ripken of Alcoholism
    if lomachenko decisively beats davis, stevenson and a few other guys he can make a case . especially if you consider his amateur career
     
  3. Jesus of montreal

    Jesus of montreal WBC Silver Diamond Emeritus Champ

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2006
    Messages:
    12,939
    Likes Received:
    2,110
    Too early to tell. The lopez.loss is a huge blemish on loma record, but for all the accolades bud gets for beating porter (and i give him plenty) we have to rebember that.porter mo is losing to top fighters.

    But currently, momentum seems to be in bud favor
     
  4. Xplosive

    Xplosive X-MOD Bad Motherfucker

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2003
    Messages:
    55,554
    Likes Received:
    13,218
    Location:
    Your girl's crib
    A Stevenson win would be big for Loma. Loma-Tank is never happening.
     
    George Crowcroft likes this.
  5. George Crowcroft

    George Crowcroft "Twinkle Toes" McJack

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2020
    Messages:
    5,449
    Likes Received:
    3,258
    Gender:
    Male
    The problem with trying to compare them is Bud has had a much easier career than Lomachenko. Bud has never been the smaller guy bar once, against Porter and that was only by five pounds. He never been at a reach disadvantage, and he spent the first two entire title reigns draining badly and coming near the middleweight limit. He outweighed Gamboa by more than 15lbs. Lomachenko, for all of his faults, has never tried to shrink down to a smaller weight than he could, and clearly is happy taking on challenges. Bud has never been, and will never be, in the same situation Loma was against Linares, Campbell or Teofimo.
     
    Azazel and Irish like this.
  6. Azazel

    Azazel "Twinkle Toes" McJack

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2006
    Messages:
    7,745
    Likes Received:
    919
    Crawford might have been better but greater will definitely be Loma imo. Bud never even beat a Gary Russell level fighter
     
    George Crowcroft likes this.
  7. Double L

    Double L Book Reader

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2003
    Messages:
    28,609
    Likes Received:
    1,816
    bud would have to rally the rest of his career and clean up his division to have a chance of being greater. and even then, loma will have presumably also added to his resume. so does not seem likely.
     
    Azazel likes this.
  8. Flo-Raiden

    Flo-Raiden Undisputed Champion

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2020
    Messages:
    2,173
    Likes Received:
    1,325
    Gender:
    Male
    Hard to say since both their careers haven't ended yet. Crawford seems to have a better "looking" career just based on still being undefeated and was also undisputed at 140. Loma definitely had a more challenging line of fighters that he's had to face, especially a weight bully like Lopez. If Loma can win against the likes of Haney, Kambosos, Tank, or even a Lopez rematch then he'll have an argument. Problem is that he's undersized and Crawford always appears bigger. Loma is the more athletically talented of the 2 but Crawford maintains a high ring IQ and always seems to find a way to end fights dramatically.
     

Share This Page