Chuck get exposed again.......ROO ROH :(

after last night its hard too say,anybody can lose in MMA and I MEAN ANYBODY so I'm just enjoying Rampages success while it last.

Sylvia sucks though and him dominating the division tells you how bad it was at the time and it was BAD and Gonzaga has potential ,he just need more time and more fights.

 

Correct.

 

Like I said then, besides Fedor then everyone in MMA has pretty much been exposed.

 

yeah but when you have stupid tuffers and Dana White hyping the shit out of him,it becomes more emotional when something bad happens to him.::

 

Good point.

 

Damned if that ain't sour grapes valdosta.

Chuck was owned against Rampage TWICE head to head.

 

I just wanted to mention that that fight shouldn't have been a split decision, it was a clear-as-day win for Jardine. It was funny at the end of the fight Rogan asked Couture what his scorecard was and he says something along the lines of "Well Chuck won the first and Jardine dominated the second, the third was close but I gave it to Jardine." The third was fucking clear-cut for Jardine. Oh well, at least he got the decision. Also, LMAO at Chuck at the end raising his arms as if he had won...

 

I had it 3-0 Jardine though the first rd was competitive I though jardine landed the much cleaner blows.

 

Not only the much cleaner blows, but blows period. Chuck was beaten thoroughly...

 

No shit. My point was pretty simple. Just because a guy losses don't mean he is exposed. Especially not at 37 years of age. If that's the case Jackson has been exposed several times in his career already.

 

WORD

 

......

Not sure why you are so happy about Lidell losing. All it does is diminishes Jackson's win.

 

:: You're one of those types of fans eh? Jackson slaughtered Chuck in his prime, Chuck went on a spree destroying everybody including the current heavyweight champ twice, and then Jackson slaughters him again, and now Chuck is damaged goods.
It does nothing to diminish Jackson's win.

 

Umm no it doesn't,you said he was "past his prime" against Jardine,so it doesn't effect Jackson's wins at all because Jackson beat him when he was in his prime and again when he was on a 7 fight win streak and you was calling Chuck #2 p4p behind Fedor.

 

The problem is that you can't have it both ways. You can't say Chuck was an ordinary fighter who got exposed by Jardine and in the same breath claim Chuck as huge wins on Jackson's resume.

Personally I think Rampage would always beat Chuck, but Jardine got a ring worn, faded Chuck Lidell. .

 

If Jackson didn't beat Lidell he wouldn't be the #1 guy at 205. The fact that Jardine did it right after Jackson leaves some doubts in my mind. How impressive was Jackson's win REALLY over Lidell? Hmmmm.......

Oh and BTW he isn't rated #1 based off the first win over Lidell because he got beat plenty of times after that.