James Toney vs Victor Galindez @ 175

Discussion in 'Mythical Matchups' started by Flo-Raiden, Feb 22, 2024.

  1. Flo-Raiden

    Flo-Raiden Undisputed Champion

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2020
    Messages:
    1,619
    Likes Received:
    1,087
    Gender:
    Male
    2 crafty counter punchers with great head movement who also fought off the ropes. Who do you think wins this blood bath?
     
  2. Jesus of montreal

    Jesus of montreal WBC Silver Diamond Emeritus Champ

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2006
    Messages:
    12,539
    Likes Received:
    1,950
    Toney at his best was a bit sharper and faster. He also wasnt the bleeder Galindez was.. He wins a competitive decision. Anything else than toney at his best, Victor outworks him
     
  3. Xplosive

    Xplosive X-MOD Bad Motherfucker

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2003
    Messages:
    54,098
    Likes Received:
    12,283
    Location:
    Your girl's crib
    I'd go with Galindez without hesitation. Toney did nothing at 175 to warrant picking him over Galindez, and I also think Galindez's style is problematic for Toney.

    Galindez roughs Toney up and clearly out-fights him to a clear UD.
     
    Fortunato and George Crowcroft like this.
  4. George Crowcroft

    George Crowcroft "Twinkle Toes" McJack

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2020
    Messages:
    5,299
    Likes Received:
    3,137
    Gender:
    Male
    Toney had no performances worth anything at 175. He lost to Griffin and that's it; there's no reason to choose him against any decent light-heavyweight he isn't tailor made to beat.
     
  5. Jesus of montreal

    Jesus of montreal WBC Silver Diamond Emeritus Champ

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2006
    Messages:
    12,539
    Likes Received:
    1,950
    Are we talking about the actual toney at 175, who was lazy and unmotivated? Or a mythical version of Toney who could have been a beast at 175 if he gave a damn? There's no reason to think Toney couldn't have been great at 175, since he was great at 168 and 190
     
  6. Xplosive

    Xplosive X-MOD Bad Motherfucker

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2003
    Messages:
    54,098
    Likes Received:
    12,283
    Location:
    Your girl's crib
    In a mythical marchup a fighter has to have shown he can perform well in said weight class. Toney, for whatever reason, never performed optimally at 175. No where near well enough to favor him over the best light heavyweight of the mid-70s and an ATG light heavy in general.
     
  7. Double L

    Double L Book Reader

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2003
    Messages:
    28,283
    Likes Received:
    1,684
    Okay, but that decision to Griffin was bullshit.
     
  8. Jesus of montreal

    Jesus of montreal WBC Silver Diamond Emeritus Champ

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2006
    Messages:
    12,539
    Likes Received:
    1,950

    It's obvious he sucked at 175 cause he was training on bk, hence him ballooning up not long after. Again, if he was able to perform at 168 and 190 (and even at hw), there's no rational reason that can explain im "sucking" at 175 bar not taking the sport seriously (which was known by everyone)
     
    Last edited: Feb 23, 2024
  9. George Crowcroft

    George Crowcroft "Twinkle Toes" McJack

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2020
    Messages:
    5,299
    Likes Received:
    3,137
    Gender:
    Male
    Disagree, iirc I had Toney winning one close and losing one close. Even if Toney should've won, it was against Griffin. That's the level that Toney fought at 175. He may as well have skipped the weight class entirely.
     

Share This Page