Joe Calzaghe vs Marvin Hagler 160lbs

Don't really see it.

Roldan was like a good version of andrade. He nearly beat Hearns, wich would have been a huge win.

I could see Roldan beating Kessler, who's very overated.

I think theyr level is pretty similar

 

not really

you didn't answer it

it was a legit question

but if you want to get butthurt about it, carry on

 

False. Even worse, he let Leotard win. He did win and he always won. I hate Gay Leotard , easily one of my least favorite fighters. He did beat Hagler legitimately and that cunt Hagler knows it too.

 

big accomplishment... Light Heavyweight versus MIddleweight... Where's this thread's matchup taking place again?

 

Kessler was a more talented and skilled guy than Roldan, for sure... but since when is that the only measure of fights

There are other factors... Roldan was very strong, powerful and extremely awkward to fight... he lost to the best of the best but gave them a lot of problems

If Kessler is demonstrably better, it's by a small margin

 

Calzaghe is a 168 lb version of Juan Diaz. He doesn't beat a prime Bernard Hopkins, forget a prime Marvin Hagler.

 

its a silly topic. calzaghe could never have made 160lbs. hagler was a superior fighter without a doubt, anyhow.

if you want to use roldan vs kessler as some sort of resume' comparison it hardly helps haglers case.

lots of hyperbole in this topic on both sides

 

Calzaghe is light years better than Juan Diaz, it's not even close. You must be joking.