Marco Antonio Barrera vs Kennedy McKinney - 30 Year Anniversary

Discussion in 'General Boxing Discussion' started by Flo-Raiden, Feb 3, 2026.

  1. Flo-Raiden

    Flo-Raiden Undisputed Champion

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2020
    Messages:
    2,513
    Likes Received:
    1,441
    Gender:
    Male
    It’s already been 30 years since one of the best fights of the 90s took place. Before Barrera’s epic trilogy bouts with Erik Morales he had one other fight that was just as exciting which was against Kennedy McKinney. A 12 round slugfest from start to finish that would ultimately propel the young Barrera’s ATG career. This fight took place in the same year as the more famous Tyson vs Holyfield 1 bout which was considered FOTY for 1996 but IMO this was an even better match from that year.

     
  2. Neil

    Neil tueur de grenouilles

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2006
    Messages:
    39,233
    Likes Received:
    4,372
    Occupation:
    The Cal Ripken of Alcoholism
    The BaD launch fight

    Im mad I didn't go to this at the forum
     
  3. Xplosive

    Xplosive X-MOD Bad Motherfucker

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2003
    Messages:
    56,687
    Likes Received:
    13,754
    Location:
    Your girl's crib
    Technically this was a better fight that Tyson-Holy 1, but it was only natural that the former was gonna get FOTY.

    It was a dramatic, violent fight that was years and years in the making, and it ended with one of the biggest upsets in boxing history. Because the rematch ended in disgrace, I think people tend to forget how fast-paced and exciting the first fight was. Better than any sloppy bullshit the heavyweights of today produce. Holy and Tyson actually know how to fight, which is more than I can say for today's heavyweight lot.

    Barrera, who was a huge favorite over McKinney, ultimately doing what he was supposed to do, was not the same level of drama and suspense.

    Tyson-Holy 1 was accurate for 96 FOTY imo.
     
    Last edited: Feb 3, 2026
    Jesus of montreal likes this.
  4. Slice N Dice

    Slice N Dice Big stiff idiot

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2007
    Messages:
    25,584
    Likes Received:
    3,827
    Location:
    West London
    I don't necessarily disagree, because the fight was huge, the result shocking, and the finish was absolutely superb. I just find Tyson-Holy I doesn't have the same rewatch value now. Just too much clinching (and not all initiated by Holyfield, contrary to the majority of retrospectives of that bout), Tyson just couldn't sustain any combination punching. I get though that at the time there was always the threat of the one-punch finish which kept things on tenterhooks.
     
    Erratic and Xplosive like this.
  5. Xplosive

    Xplosive X-MOD Bad Motherfucker

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2003
    Messages:
    56,687
    Likes Received:
    13,754
    Location:
    Your girl's crib
    I agree with you. MAB-McKinney is more re-watchable.

    I'm a Tyson fan, I dont watch Mike's losses often.
     
    Slice N Dice likes this.
  6. Erratic

    Erratic "Twinkle Toes" McJack

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2003
    Messages:
    9,209
    Likes Received:
    960
    Occupation:
    Professional Bum
    Home Page:
    Holyfield-Tyson 1 was a great event/upset and good fight, but I prefer other fights in 96’ like Barrera-McKinney, Liles-Littles 2, Kelley-Gainer 1, Gatti-Rodriguez and Bowe-Golota 2.

    Although I was legit worried when watching it that Bowe would die in the ring. I remember having this eerie feeling about it.
     
    Xplosive likes this.

Share This Page