How Did You Score This Round?

calmate, chilangodogg187

 

Morales won that second fight clear as day.

He won the first fight too, although I can accept an argument for Barrera. I had morales 7-4 going into the final round and so that bogus knockdown still wouldn't have made a difference to the outcome.

 

Are you good at singing and playing the piano and harmonica?

 

Yes he did you whore!

I don't see how anyone could score the first fight for Morales, and the same goes the other way for the second fight. There's no way Barrera won that.

 

Morales was flat out robbed in that second fight . The fight and the scoring was reminiscent of De La Hoya bs Mosley 2 in which I felt Oscar was similarly robbed

 

Yes there is WAY, cunt

I'm well chuffed, aye ... I'll sort you out

 

Sounds like somebody was impressed by all the BIG RIGHT HAND! that Morales landed on Barrera's gloves

 

Nah, sounds like someone just doesn't like morales

 

You fucks need to put some respeck on the name of the gawd el terrible on the day his father passed away. RIP señor morales

 

Scoring the first fight for morales is indefensible

 

114-113 Morales know wha am saying! 7 rounds to 5...with an additional point deducted from morales because of the bogus KD

 

Ridiculous score, man

 

Your face is ridiculous! ;)

 

Whoa whoa whoa! Mods?

 

seriously! How can he get away with that?!?!?

 

I score that round and the fight for Morales. I remember watching the fight after all the controversy- and was surprised to observe that Morales won quite clearly.

 

This man knows boxing

 

THIS

I scored each individual minute and Barrera only got the end of the second minute when he rocked Morales and had him hurt for like 15 seconds, but for most of the round it was all Morales landing almost at will from the start and rocking Barrera twice.

 

I think you should always go with the decision you had first time around, even if you change your mind when re-watching it. The judges don't get the option of changing their decision and neither should you.

 

I am still laughing that some dickweed on here claimed that Erik Morales was "slow." :wrong:

 

I've heard cdogg say almost the exact same shit before and while it sounds clever ( and is valid to an extent) it's ok to admit that you were wrong. Sometimes we get caught up in the euphoria of the moment and it clouds our better judgement. Judges should not allow themselves to be caught up in the crowd or in the moment but should be completely objective when scoring.

 

I've never, ever got that.

 

It is fine to admit you were wrong, as long as you include the fact that you scored it a different way initially. For example, I scored Pacquiao-Marquez II a draw and Pacquiao-Marquez III for Marquez. In hindsight I view those fights differently but I will always point out that I scored those fights as such when I first saw them and that is my final decision.

We are all long-time boxing fans by the way so I don't buy that whole "caught up in the crowd" thing, I score it as I see it.

 

D Man had pac/Bradley a draw

 

dont listen to clogg. he is biased ever since morales referred to him as a 'chicken hearted' white guy

 

Please... He was mad because I housed him in a spirited River Oaks sparring session

 

Yup it was a very close fight- I counted even # of rounds. The judges and alot of people agree.

 

54 of 55 polled fightbeat posters disagreed as well something like 33 out of 36 writers

 

First time I watched DLH vs Trinidad I thought Tito clearly lost, but after all the euphoria at forums I changed my mind. Later I rewatched the fight I again saw Tito winning only four rounds, but I am still in denial if you want to argue with me about that decision.

 

I wouldn't put alot of faith in these folks opinions.