They obviously do though.
Do you get the impression that, in his mind, he could have won that fight had he trained harder?
What did he say about Adamek??
Yes, and beating Tarver, Wright and Pavlik.
Inferior resume, not necessarily fighter.
:lol: I'm just answering question posed in the thread. I agree, though. When you include what they did outside of their long reigns,...
No Arreola? :lol:
Glen Johnson is another guy who is head and shoulders better than anyone Calzaghe beat at 168.
psssssst... you might want to read the thread title. When did Calzaghe fight Hopkins during his reign at '68?
Maybe not individually. :lol: No one can defend Calzaghe disgusting reign at 168.
You're suggesting either of those guys were even close to Tito's stature in 2001? Really?
Tito at lightheavyweight? You have to take Hopkins.
GARBAGE
Doesn't matter. It's a greater win by a significant margin. You can't take it away from Bernard because he made it look easy. Kessler is...
Does he noticably hate your sister now?
:lol:
The fuck you mean you disagree? You don't know anything about the guy. What's the matter with you Hex?
Both were pretty bad. The Tito wins craps all over anything Joe did, however.
Calzaghe openly refused to fight anyone decent during his prime years, including Hopkins.
Calzaghe, because of his name, really could have fought anyone for good coin. He decided not to go after the best. Hopkins wanted the best but...
The biggest difference? Calzaghe had options. Hopkins didn't.
Ali 7-3 Louis 10-0 Hagler/Hopkins 5-5
Steroids.
Kessler is an excuse making bitch.
Anyone who can fight at his pace without gassing is in great, great shape. The guy trains for a fight, not to be Mr. Olympia.
Many are.
[IMG]
Vitali Klitschko Antonio Tarver Fernando Vargas Nate Campbell Kermit Cintron Rocky Juarez John Ruiz Joe Calzaghe First 8 that popped...
Will you apologize to Hanzy when he makes his debut?
What? That thread had actual video of Bautista training for MMA. :lol:
Separate names with a comma.
