The latter list of fighters are more intelligent than the former. That's not a coincidence.
They were both somewhat crude bangers but Barkley was on another level up from Roldan.
There's no proof he didn't.
Isn't that the story of every prospect though? If it's not dope it's another "issue".
Maybe if you read the book you wouldn't have lost the first matchup to the watermelon. You wasted a lot time for a rematch that didn't need to...
I hope they stay true to the real story and don't fabricate anything.
Here comes Jake and his fancy facts.
I'd like a chapter by chapter.
:lol::bears:
I don't know anything about the book but being i'm a glass half empty kind of guy i'm going to say no.
Based on?
I've been telling everybody that Zhong was a future WBC belt holder for years but nobody would listen.
I can see that. Could be kind of similar to how Ali's opponents felt.
Leonard speed and movement bothered Hagler most of all. I'm not saying that Ray didn't land some hard shots but it wasn't what Marvin was having...
I think Leonard hit harder as well but i don't believe his power had Hagler bothered at all.
Typo
Leonard KO 14
:lol:
Kimbo is an internet sensation. They didn't even know what the internet was in 1988. That's got to be a big advantage for Kimbo. Like UGBK says...
Yep
Same. Was it better my miles? No, of course not but i think as a weapon it was more lethal.
Yep. Oscar improved his right hand later on but it still wasn't a punch to "fear".
Welter and above it's Leonard, but for just one single punch i think De La Hoya's left hook was a bit more potent of a weapon.
He is a Cotto clone. Plants his front foot and crouches while throwing a jab. Converted southpaw style is obvious when walking away.
And welterweights
Your mother is a whore.
Probably, but if he's even 70% of the guy who fought Cotto he can beat Kirkland.
That could get ugly. :lol:
:bears:
:laughing:
Separate names with a comma.
