Can this abortion be moved to the gaygefighting section where it now belongs?
:lol:
Napoles, Gavilan, Curry, Griffith, Luis Rodriguez would all beat Mayweather at 147... I don't even have a shadow of a doubt about it I agree...
I think it would be just as virtuostic a performance as Camacho or Whitaker managed... but different than both Whitaker basically hammered...
being depressed about something, about life is "womanly/effeminate"??:dunno:
yeah, you reserve your sympathy strictly for millionaire businessmen:boohoo:
:laughing:
Sly, the only reason you can think of only three welterweights that would beat Mayweather is because you are only aware of about 6 notable...
Breland was far too fragile, there's no way he would ever beat Trinidad... he could dominate him for 10 minutes, smash his nose to pieces with his...
you are suggesting that Hopkins wasn't a dominant middleweight champion?
I actually picked Hopkins to school Pavlik, shows what you know about anything What YOU are missing is that Chavez always FORCED opponents to...
when will YOU learn that there are actually other great fighters besides Floyd Mayweather?
Hopkins-- Great Middleweight Wright -- Clearly, way fucking better than Felix Sturm I don't see how Sturm is really any better than William Joppy
hard to rate that, because he basically got killed
yeah, seriously I must have missed where a guy needs to be a great middleweight to beat Felix fucking Sturm
They both have ideal styles to trouble the other... what concerns me for Mayweather's sake is that I don't know that he's active enough to win THE...
good movie, fun movie one of my favorite old actors, Robert Shaw, is terrific in that
Neither guy is much to write home about, But I have to think that Kirkland's style is the only type of style that really allows Angulo to win...
I'd have to think that Napoles is just too damn slick for Tito... he'd be countering that hook with his own all night... barring a bad cut...
Agree... though it's hard to really rate 154 for a guy like Napoles who didn't fight there
that is a perfect analogy
same here on both counts
:bears:you know this game
He did beat him at 147, though
Fair enough, I stand corrected... the Corrales analogy is a good one, and that shit is frequently repeated as FACT around here
p4p is stupid, not because of the concept, but because there doesn't appear to be any consistent parameters for determining it
could he beat Mata Hari?
uppin
old, shot faggots, maybe
LOL< why bump this one, Dog? did something change in either guy's career since last time?
Separate names with a comma.