hmmmmmm Ill get back to you on this
Man, I have a lot of trouble putting any middleweight in there with Foster... middleweights fighting Foster is like Foster fighting heavyweights...
I'd favor Griffith, frankly, much more versatile fighter than Toney, far more dependable workrate... I think he simply does more work than Toney...
Louis had more offensive weapons than either Norton or Foreman (notice I didn't say he was more powerful than Foreman, just that he had a more...
Leonard with consumate ease... To me, Carter's entire career is based off a fluke KO of Emile Griffith... the rest of the time, he was clearly put...
Lockridge competes evenly for the first 7 or 8, throwing and landing more while Arguello is more selective and lands the better shots... but those...
Liston, but with a great deal more difficulty than anyone here will probably admit... If Mercer ahd one thing going for him besides an anvil for a...
If EMM lets his hands go, i think he wins a very clear decision, just from harder, more effective punching... but I can just as likely see him...
hmmm... my knee-jerk response is Qawi, but I need to think more about this
I think Ali's speed was so extraordinary that the tactics that troubled him a lot in the 70s dont necessarily apply here... I see what Hut is...
I think it MIGHT even it up, but not make it better before he got his chance to unify against Holmes and Trinidad (and later cementing it with a...
possibly, I think its a superb match, I like Hagler a bit more to win it, but its a great matchup
Chacon/Boza/Limon/Navarette was such a great round robin of mayhem of course, none of them could do a thing with Alexis
I never understood where all the "Lewis is gay" stuff came from, other than his having a british accent anyway, he was a great fighter who could...
this was already done two months ago
Nunn... two guys with two of the flukiest and most memorable KOs in history I dont really care that Martinez beat Williams and Pavlik, Im not...
Tommy Farr took Louis the distance by fighting in a croutch and covering up while losing every round as Louis chopped him up with his jab......
but that is a pretty major difference
I would argue that Tyson was clearly greater than Hamed... he unified his division, rather than holding 1/4 of the belts... Tyson's comp was, in...
thats a weak argument though The REST of their competition is NO CONTEST Hagler's middleweight opponents, the actual middleweights were VASTLY...
Agree Oscar is one of those guys who I can't really envision anyone beating EASILY... he's good enough to beat A LOT of fighters, and good...
he's one of the guys I forgot I'll add him
Quartey's comp in losing was better than the bulk of Calzaghe's undefeated record... if I had a 168 pounder who was exactly the same as Ike...
God, Double is comedy gold
I did, noticed it immediately after I typed it out
to me, if you are one of the 5 best in any decade, you are pretty friggin' great
from 1990 until now: Whitaker Jones Mayweather Chavez J Marquez Lewis Pac-Man Hopkins Holyfield NEAR greats (still, obviously HOFers but just...
whoa... hold on a minute this is a full fledged middleweight here, and a tough middleweight at that... Floyd's a great fighter but I think this...
hmmm... dont know who gets docked first, but I'd bet Hamsho because Hopkins was better at not getting caught... dirty, dirty fight won by the more...
I dont have a problem with him rating Floyd highly or whatever, but I do have a problem when he starts simply making shit up about other fighters...
Separate names with a comma.
