Probably worse in reality, but a different style of opponent.
:atu::bears::lol:
Me too usually. Not to be contrarian for the sake of it, but i do think it's interesting on one level. Who wins? No of course not, but how it...
That is certainly true. However i think you're missing something or we're talking about two slightly different things. In my understanding of...
More fitting would be pugilstic dementia.
Classy
That would be an entertaining fight but screams controversial decision either way.
Agreed again.
... that had to burn down further to top it off
Agreed. None of them present anything he hasn't seen before.
Gerald was a very dangerous fighter but i could see Leonard outsmarting him and winning a decision.
The removal of those two words then would not answer the poll question.
Agreed. Coin toss this one.
Now that Spaddy's back Mayweather might just fight Manny to avoid him.
Bolded is my favorite. :clapagain:
Yes but that's different.
He's a totally legit challenger, you don't know boxing.
:laughing::bears:
Rafael Marquez They'll hype up the "Revenge of the Brother" angle.
Well even accidentally he couldn't get somebody out of there.
He could then retire as the greatest super middleweight of all time. Nothing further to prove. :bears:
Yep, he couldn't even put the hurt on with a gun let alone his fists.
Much better opponent than Cotto, Clottey and Margarito who each have losses. :partie:
Haha no i haven't but have heard. My dad's cousin lives about 3 miles out of Houston and said the humidity is beyond ridiculous.
Why not move there? Here's the Houston Association of Realtor's web site. Should give you a head start in finding a home....
:atu:
Pacquiao UD
I'd stick with the chess excuse if i was her.
The latter.
If Manny was on roids before there's no reason to believe he wouldn't be for this fight as well.
Separate names with a comma.
