quite a bit better meaning ALOT? Young was a slippery guy and did have the better chin then Byrd
thats what im talking about before....these days being a natural weight don't mean anything.....you can pack on the muscle and compete at higher...
If Canelo had been smarter he would have waited until he was seasoned a little more and Floyd looking old one night....cause now Floyd is gonna...
213 but even then I think he chose to stay on the lighter side...against Ruiz he weighed in at 222
besides Manny vs Oscar...would you think it possible for manny to fill out the way he did with muscle and move up all that weight in the 1950s?...
they have been shitty...I agree with porky on this one
read from the beginning of the thread...some people started throwing in Gatti and I took the bait ha ha
but my point is that it seems like fighters these days can move through a lot of weight classes because of science....would manny PAC have been...
Everyone fights each other in MMA unlike boxing. Also those guys that get title shots based on 1 win probably from suffering a loss beforehand...
that's a very good point....it's easier to move up and challenge a belt champion rather then the unified holder....but even then you still don't...
i don't agree.... in boxing today a smaller fighter still has the opportunity to put on enough weight on to contend against a fighter from a...
i transitioned to MMA a while ago from boxing due to the lack of quality fighters in boxing and all the belt holders anyhow....Silva for me...
yes porky...i watched one fighter that i dislike lose to another fighter I dislike more....i felt inspired to pay a visit
YUP Fury is unwatchable
I hate Malignaggi
seems like fighters these days can easily grow into other divisions more easily then fighters from the past....putting on muscle weight for...
ya because David Haye would be the favorite against one of the hardest punching relentless heavyweights of all time who never lost...LOL
you black people are obsessed with Gatti....throw in the M & Ms on this forum as well damn its starting to make sense
Agree on all counts except for the turf and weight class thing.....turf does not matter if the crowd cheers for Broner..the jerk had more support...
LOL at your post as I don't want to discuss Gatti...i didn't pay a visit around here to discuss him....maybe in mythical matchups...not in threads...
i had it that way as well....but then it all went downhill from there I only gave Paulie one more round after that.....funny though the 4...
this would be a mismatch...Marciano briefly dropped twice in his career by legendary fighters in Walcott and Moore hard to imagine Haye putting...
I think Shavers wins because he isnt the slow lumbering heavyweight that Byrd likes to feast on....plus i will bank on shavers catching and...
I think Meldrick is too busy for Broner...Meldrick by wide decision
man....I come back for a visit to make some comments and everyone relates to Arturo Gatti? Gatti was a good fighter and now he is dead lets move...
anyhow..boxing is filled with so many crappy fighters i don't see too many people that can beat him...even the Argentine that everyone is braggin...
you make it sound like Gatti was some kind of chump...if you ignore his last couple of fights where he looked really bad starting with...
i cringe when you mention anything being matched in accomplishment Duran beat 2 hall of fame fighter in Ken Buchanan and the legendary Sugar Ray...
alright man...i was just checking....because i never seen such a guy full of himself.....I would really like Floyd to put an end to this
you don't admire this guy do you?
Separate names with a comma.