Before you knew me, you used to compliment me on how well I owned him. If you'd really wanted to look smart, you could've said that Mugabi never...
Mugabi was a TINY middleweight who never had a meaningful win over 154. Only a true idiot - like Slystaff - would pick him over Tarver at 175....
Being a moderator at this shithole isn't anything to brag about. Who wants to brag about hanging out with Petre, Jaws and Phonetap?
You know, it's been six years since he struggled with Wilfredo Rivera, marking the end of his prime. I wouldn't pick him against any top fighter...
That's the dumbest thing you've said in weeks. Barrera was far past his prime when he fought Kelley. I doubt you've ever seen him at 122, except...
He was at his prime in the DeJesus rubber match, and he was at welterweight shortly thereafter. The Duran that beat Sugar Ray Leonard would be no...
We're talking prime vs. prime at 147, not at 154.
Spinks does, by knockout. Rumors of Moorer actually being good at heavyweight turned out to be false.
The thread is about comparing Duran to Tito, not about Trinidad, himself.
What does that have to do with Carlos Palomino in 1979?
What does that have to do with how good Palomino was in 1979? Agreed, a split decision wasn't warranted, but Palomino was a clever boxer who...
Someone checked Boxrec instead of actually watching the fights Palomino had in 1979. Jim Brown had one foot out of the sport in 1965. Does that...
He beat a coked-up Whitaker, Oba Carr and Hector Camacho against losing to Oscar de la Hoya, while Duran beat Carlos Palomino and Sugar Ray...
In the hospital, I had tubes coming out of my chest in two places, plus my nose and my cock, but never my ass. You seem more inclined that way.
Without steroids, Pacquiao would be nothing.
Now you're contradicting yourself. And it was stupid of you to say he'd beat Duran in his prime. You're comparing Vargas to the bloated Duran of...
But your point was stupid, and ill-formed. The original post was about comparing Tito's competition to Duran. That's a valid point.
Huh? I'm not the one who brought it up. I merely pointed out that you were sounding stupid.
But isn't that the whole point of this section?
It's sad when the best thing you can say about a fighter is that he could beat a 46-year-old man.
Vargas wouldn't do shit against the Duran of 1979.
Everyone knows that Double L is full of shit. What will a sig bet change? A good one would be: "You should have known I was an idiot when I...
All I said was that Tyson by KO late was a bad pick. You said it wasn't because Tyson KOed Ribalta late. That's stupid, because lots of shitty...
Okay, so you understand Google, but not irony, the trademarks of a mediocre poster.
What year? When I was living in the Philippines almost a decade ago, he was being billed as a defensive artist with a punch.
Besides that, Taylor's much more rounded a fighter than Trinidad was. A better fighter? No. A better middleweight? Yes.
Shit, this is a 147-pound mathchup, not a 154-pound matchup. How hard is that to figure out, Alabama man?
Easy win for Buddy.
Based on what? His win over the imitable Jeff Lacy?
No. I said that it was a shitty pick. It is. If you have a mythical matchup between Chris Byrd and Ron Lyle, it's stupid to pick Byrd by KO,...
Separate names with a comma.