I havent seen the movie, but i believe they just called it a prequal, moved the location, and had the exact same thing happen in the 82 version...
Yeah an agreement. Both fighters would have to agree to it. If not, they cant do it. BJ has been training for a 3 round fight. I doubt he...
i just heard they stole many scenes from the 82 movie and basically reshot them for this movie.
Rap, Roosters & Policemen: The Life & Times of Roy Jones, Jr.
Yeah it's a remake. It was initially labeled as a prequel, but its not.
Which original are you talking about? The one in 1982 is a remake of The Thing from Another world, which is fucking terrific.
Keep your pants on
[IMG]
<iframe width="640" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/i-M5Qx57_UU" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Bullshit comparison IMO. Dawson's foul was throwing him down while grabbing the back of his leg. A clear indicator that he wanted Hopkins to...
The solution is to have capable referees that know the rules. It would be nice to have a few fans that knew them too.
Wow shocker:rolleyes:
No explanation needed. Anderson Silva is clearly a homosexual
This was great LMAO
Exactly. IMO Khan doesnt want no part of Manny either.
This is why having a great co-main event is crucial in MMA. This is still a good card.
This is where your post should have ended. But i know you cant accept the truth.
Nobody isnt happy about the outcome. We just know it's going to get overturned.
Good so you are done. Such a ridiculous argument on your part. You should be ashamed of yourself.
Im done with this bullshit. You dont know what the fuck you are talking about.
Sly seriously, I do apologize. It was a totally just instinct on my part.
Yeah i dont think it was a dive. The kid just sucks.
that is why it will be rulled a NC
FOULS
Oh please. JMM knew where the money was. He wanted some of it. Dont blame the promoters.
What was subjective about Dawson grabbing the back of Hopkins' leg before shoving his shoulder into him? Can someone fucking address THAT detail.
Oh sorry. The arguement was so ridiculous, I thought i was debating you. Apologies.
stop being ridiculous sly
I dont think there is this huge demand that you say there is.
The fact there was no foul called, doesnt change the fact that there was, indeed, a foul. That is why most people are saying it will be overturned.
Separate names with a comma.
