Holmes was not as durable as holyfield. He was resilient no doubt. But holy could fight through it. Holmes would be visibly hurt and need to...
In my opinion Holmes does not beat Lewis. I base this on the fact he never beat anyone like Lewis. And he struggled with lots of lesser fighters...
Lewis beats Holmes and Bowe.
Hollywood is pathetic.
Right. Of course. Referring to cotto's ability to hurt his opponent.
I agree those guys are not as good as canelo. But I still think cotto surprised a lot of people with the power he showed in those fights....
It is good.
No. But he showed suckiness and not all of it was attributable to booze.
True. Pavlik's suckiness can't all be blamed on booze.
The wild card here is Cotto's power. Against delvin and geal he seemed to show a level of punching power that had been missing. If that is real...
Who is it today?
Maybe this was an easy decision for cotto given that he has no intentions of actually competing as a middleweight.
Too bad this fight never happened. Was gatti already done by the time Hatton came on? Why didn't this fight happen?
Manfredy pretty much had a shit chin. He beat gatti. That is about it.
Before? Pretty sure Pavlik has always been a stinking drunk.
Hearns defies gravity, levitates across the ring and knocks Margarito out with a right hand to the top of the cranium.
Jacobs apparently has no chin. And whatever you say about Quillen, he has punching power. Quillen by KO.
Pac should be favored.
Really looking forward to this fight.
See lewis/holy I to see Lewis when he fights to win. See lewis/holy ii to see how lewis fights after he interprets having been robbed to mean that...
You just tried to say that since Holmes had an easier time with mercer than Lewis did that he could beat lewis. I have seen you lecture people...
P4p baby!
:lol:
Is Hearns foreman? Is Duran frazier? Look. We disagree on this. No amount of ill-conceived analogies from you will change that.
Nothing if you "LiTeRaLlY" ignore the man's entire body of work and pretend Hearns had no vulnerabilities of his own. Again, before you forget,...
Because Duran was an all time great fighter who showed amazing versatility and the ability to adjust against the likes of SRL and Hagler. He...
I didn't say I would pick Duran to win. But I would not rule out the possibility. Duran showed against SRL and Hagler, among others, that he...
This was exactly what I meant. The other thing is, if the two had fought again it is in no way assured that Hearns would've won.
Poor broner.
How is Hearns Duran a mismatch?
Separate names with a comma.
