Floyd is mentioned in order to IDENTIFY the Mittwork. Don't harp on Floyd....instead consider the exercise itself. I think it's a genuine...
ZED! Do you side with Steve and Ramonza (Only Lineal champs have the distinction "CHAMPION") or do you side with myself, Hut and UGO (depends...
The spirit of the question is whether the mitt work is useful or if it's just for show? My response is that "it's useful". Is yours that it's...
Sounds like you're fence riding. What is your vote?
His question is fair when you consider your "whole" post! You started by saying: "The linear Champion is THE champ, period."
In fact...I've only just found out today from your post that Foreman even fought a Grimsley!! :giggle:
well said.
Remarkably intelligent post.
How so?
Irrelevant to whether or not Foreman or Mooer were champion yes, in that I agree that Foreman WAS the champion as well as Moorer before him....
Not analogous. Sorry.
But YOU voted "not in every case". So what are you saying now?
I deliberately made this a public poll and RAMONZA I'm calling you out!!! :lol: This topic was inspired by you for UNFLINCHINGLY suggesting...
Foreman beat Moorer with one punch after losing every second of every round prior to that and Moorer was one of the most vulnerable heavweight...
8-4 and all the rounds were competitive.
word. It was great in Avatar but that's about it.
I saw Thor in 3D and then the week after in 2D and honestly, I preferred the 2D version.
word
undoubtedly DISINGENUOUS!
I hear what you're saying..and they are decent examples...but I don't think they are anywhere near extreme as the Briggs-Foreman "championship"...
Sorry but...sorryass Shannon Briggs beating an ancient Foreman, who ducked everyone with a live pulse and yet LOST that fight with Schultz but was...
This post speaks more to YOUR BIAS than it does to the bias of Floyd or Pac fans. An intelligent guy like you simply can't answer a simple...
No. I'm a bigger Mayweather fan, BY FAR, in terms of "the fighter". But I distinguish my "fandom" for a fighting talent from my liking of a...
precisely. hence why I think "Consensus" champion makes more sense than either "lineal" or belts per se.
word.
I don't know where you're going with this. it's obviously a rebuttal to someone...possibly Hut's position on Duran, or many on Tyson?
See....I must respectfully disagree...but I respect your consistency. Baldomir would not be the champ in my books. Not at all. In that scenario...
Boxing elitists like to suggest that the "Lineal" Title is the only true title. In most cases this is true, but I don't think it should be the...
Yeah but is "lineal" ALWAYS the most accurate way to define who's the "champion"? That's the real question here. I don't think it is.
I respect a man who is willing to change his position in the face of good logic. That's why you will always be among the premier posters on...
Separate names with a comma.
