Depends upon which Floyd shows up. If it's the Welterweight Floyd, Monzon would be too big. If it's a Floyd enhanced by the same Super Soldier...
Ok yes, that's right...Floyd is so easy to beat. many fighters have shown the blue print as to how to outbox or KO this guy. The real Mayweather...
Floyd's less durable than benitez? Which KO loss of Floyd gave you that opinion?
Indeed. You'd swear that he was invincible if you hear the chatter. <iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/9DvPFKii9-A" allowfullscreen=""...
Eubank had bad stamina. Perhaps you didn't factor that into your calculations...and as such got very sloppy after about 7 rounds.
Bad style matchup for Floyd...but it still wont be easy (suggesting Hearns wouldn't even struggle) for Hearns. No one could have beaten Floyd...
Hagler is too much for Pac at 160lbs when you consider styles and sizes. Too much. Probably mid rounds TKO the more I think about it....
T'was a tough fight to score overall. But as I said, I had in even a draw. 7-5 either way isn't a robbery. 8-4 is though.
queer
Don't hate, appreciate. I've been wrong before and admitted it. I picked Taylor to beat Pavlik by stoppage. Pavlik stopped him. I made no...
Dude, you don't have to believe me if you don't want to. But that was my position then.
Also PLEASE tell me where I've changed positions and jumped from one gang to the next.
I didn't say I knew Holyfield would beat Tyson. You are twisting my words. I said I knew that Evander was a too much risk, no reward fight for...
:lol: Floyd wasn't that popular following the "slave contract" fiasco. He was largely ignored. When Shane beat Oscar he was the overwhelming...
word.
Sounds good, set it up. Nevertheless. Back in 1999/2000 two potential superstars emerged: Floyd Mayweather and Shane Mosley I man said Floyd...
Don't disagree....but I think you're being deliberately obtuse. Gulf in class is very important, but when discussing the Floyd-Lamotta...
Yeah but... Clay beating Cooper with that style therefore shouldn't be used to predict how he'd do against Liston. In fact it wasn't and that's...
Prime 160lbs Eubank vs 160lbs Pavlik. Hmmmmmm.......... T'would be a tough fight for Eubank. You see benn was always chinny and he didn't have...
Ah sorry....I could have SWORN this topic was for a fight at 168lbs. Did you make a mistake?
Agreed. But his determination and chin would cause him to get close to Hearns eventually and with that power of his...a KO/TKO is possible....
Nah, you don't know Eubank that well. Pavlik would have "Collins 2" Eubank. Eubank had poor workrate, couldn't reduce punch output consistently...
I don't get involved in the prediction competitions because admittedly I don't follow the majority of fighters in the game. I tend to only know...
Pavlik outworks him...and wins a UD.
word. Nunn all the way.
But Ebank had the qualities tha tRay Leonard used to beat hearns: chin and BIG BRASS BALLS. Add to that that Eubank hit harder than Leonard and...
no it isn't. :lol: You are different. But for the most part...a fighter is picked based on their RESUME and "greatness" as opposed to what...
That's why my only response to him, when he does that, will be "queer". He is a homosexual and it's not relevant to his boxing positions, but if...
For example: Robinson vs Hopkins at Middleweight. "Hopkins wins. Much bigger physically, more intelligent and crafty, better defense....
No dude. It SHOULD be based upon proper knowledge of the fighters in question. In actuality it is based upon proper knowledge of the reputation...
Separate names with a comma.
