but that is a pretty major difference
I would argue that Tyson was clearly greater than Hamed... he unified his division, rather than holding 1/4 of the belts... Tyson's comp was, in...
thats a weak argument though The REST of their competition is NO CONTEST Hagler's middleweight opponents, the actual middleweights were VASTLY...
Agree Oscar is one of those guys who I can't really envision anyone beating EASILY... he's good enough to beat A LOT of fighters, and good...
he's one of the guys I forgot I'll add him
Quartey's comp in losing was better than the bulk of Calzaghe's undefeated record... if I had a 168 pounder who was exactly the same as Ike...
God, Double is comedy gold
I did, noticed it immediately after I typed it out
to me, if you are one of the 5 best in any decade, you are pretty friggin' great
from 1990 until now: Whitaker Jones Mayweather Chavez J Marquez Lewis Pac-Man Hopkins Holyfield NEAR greats (still, obviously HOFers but just...
whoa... hold on a minute this is a full fledged middleweight here, and a tough middleweight at that... Floyd's a great fighter but I think this...
hmmm... dont know who gets docked first, but I'd bet Hamsho because Hopkins was better at not getting caught... dirty, dirty fight won by the more...
I dont have a problem with him rating Floyd highly or whatever, but I do have a problem when he starts simply making shit up about other fighters...
pretty much with X on this one, but I dont know that he stops Rosario as much as Rosario starts protecting himself and gets discouraged... I think...
he never looked like he was weighing 148, though
Wright would be the best fighter Terry Norris ever faced
Louis... quicker hands, more fortitude... Liston would hurt him early but I like Louis to either stop Liston late or sweep the last few rounds and...
McCallum knocks Norris into the Ice Age
Jones by KO
Cotto without question
Hagler is the greater middleweight, but Hopkins may be the greater overall fighter because of his other accomplishments... I voted Hagler, not...
pretty much the dumbest post ever Chavez was better at EVERYTHING that Castillo and not by a little bit... Castillo's sole advantage over Chavez...
its a tribute to how much better Chavez was that Castillo's own enthusiastic backers are only giving him a shot because he fought in an era where...
Pedroza, with or without a referee... totally different levels of fighter here
agreed... different class of fighter, even the 1987 version
Pedroza was simply unreal... he made no attempt to even conceal what he was doing guys like Hopkins, Duran, Gomez... they were sneaky... Pedroza...
Vargas could have fought a smarter fioght but I think he still would have gotten knocked out... Vargas was suceptible to the hook as it was, and...
147 its a good fight but I think Brown gets hit too much, but he'd definitely put Tito on his ass once or twice even in a losing cause......
coasting? thats an exaggeration coasting is Hector Camacho versus Jose Luis Ramirez, when the fight is far and away decided and you can win...
Rocky Lockridge and Juan Laporte were as good or better than anyone Castillo beat and were as good as the man himself
Separate names with a comma.
