no, mike method is not a valid scientific method, while mine is. Trust me, I know this game
presently, but i fail to see what it has to do with the topic, wich was wich era is bigger
whatever, I had to vulagarize it for you to understand it. You had no clue what it meant. Anyway, as I said above, I don't want to drag this...
I based it on your idiotic post in wich you tried to interpret these what it meant. Anyway, we diverge from the point of this discussion. If...
I know it wasn't you, but still, you had no clue how to interpret these notions, wich is no surprise considering your low level of education
I feel you have no clue how much the population of the planet has grown in the last century, nor that a lot more countries produce boxer than...
say the idiot who did't understand what an average and a standard deviation is. You can play on words as much as you want, still, saying that the...
whatever you say, you stinking loser
well,you're even mora an idiot than I previously tought, since the population was lower, the number of country were boxing was popular was way...
I think Holmes win pretty confortably
you just can't be serious, so the talent of the 1920 white stiff boys was better. Ridiculous
The Hw are a complete aberration, cause most big guys now have better options than boxing. Rest of the divisions seems a bit low on talent, but...
yeah, cause a guy can never improve or have a "bad" loss. you're a kid with a lame pessimistic schtick.
damn, mathysse versus garcia should be a hell of a fight
Floyd's a clown. It's obvious that he no longer have any desire to test himself. Expect him to continu fighting the Ortiz and Guerrero of this world
Ortiz rematch !!! really !!!
lol, tha'ts a gem
No, I base it on theyr sluggish pace, and the fact that the're huffing and puffing after a few rounds. And also you're making the assumption that...
no I could have used the massive 5 feet 10 , 235 lbs james toney, if I really wanted to cherry picked [ATTACH]
yeah cause guys like the 5 foot 11, 240 lbs Chagaev [ATTACH] and the 6 foot 1 ,250 lbs and + solis [ATTACH] are much bigger and stronger men...
exactly, so if you pick a random top hw from the 80's and a random top hw from the current era and match them against each other, theyr is as much...
yeah, but the average size of hw is similar to the one in the 80's, thaT' what were arguing about
Pascal would beat up Shumenov imo
As I said, I use height as a proxy for size, cause I think it's more reprensatative than weight (james toney could be considered a big hw using...
no the stats I used was using only fighter in the ring annual top 11. So , as I said, the average top 11 guy in the current era (last 25 fighters...
the standard deviation is waay bigger in the top 11 of current era than in the 80's, wich means that theyr are more taller, guy, but more shorter...
I have a question for you mike there's 2 familly one has 4 members wich are all 6 feet tall the otehr has 2 members that are 5 feet tall, and 2...
I don't get it. YOu said earlier that guys look worse than they are now cause they were bigger than before, but when I proved that they aren't...
How old are you ?? seriously As i said earlier, by using you're idiotic criteria, the 30's hw are bigger than the 80's one since Buddy Baer 199,...
Look this is ridiculous, my whole argument is that the hw in the present aren't bigger than the hw in the 80's. I used height for a proxy for...
Separate names with a comma.
