I see Phonetap the mischievous mulatto browsing. Dude...go back to Boxing fanantics and Maxboxing and leave this forum to the knowledgeable fans.
YES!! :fightme::kidcool:
I can defend Mayweather up to and including Hatton. There's no excuse for his inactivity after Hatton. He should either and retired completely or...
After Hatton I agree with you and share your frustration. But Mayweather decided to stay inactive.
Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes!!!!!
A fighter can only fight the best available opposition during his era. Up to De La Hoya, comparitively speaking, Mayweather did that. He didn't...
My logic in this thread is sound. My analogies unbreakable. Your level of intellect...embarassing. At least Cdogg is a worthy opponent for the...
Dude..... Hatton was more relevant in boxing than Cotto was...regardless of the supposed "punking" by Collazzo. Maybe Collazzo had the wrong...
The greatness of the comparitive opposition is IRRELEVANT. A guy can only fight the best avaiable threats to him at the time. You weary me with...
Actually no, it's analogous to to Ray retiring in 1987. Ray was 30 in 1987 and Floyd was 30 in 2007. Ray, in his prime had fought Duran...
fucker... You were implying that he shouldn't have fought Judah and Baldomir...but instead should have faced Cotto, margarito and Williams....
word. But his "finishers chance" is illegitimate. :lol:
By the way the Leonard retirement I'm referring to, the one that is analogous to Floyd retiring after De La Hoya, was Leonard's proposed...
You criticize me for bringing up Toney and Benn (Quite rightly) but then you talk about Cotto and Williams as matchups when Floyd first moved up...
Splendid! :bears: it's "Cheetah" btw...
I can see why it has been perceived his way. But the fact is that Floyd has faced the best and beat the best. He's retired more men than social...
When Floyd moved to 147lbs...the main guys for him to fight were, like it or not, Judah and Baldomir. NO ONE was complaining about those matchups...
It was assumed that Floyd had retired after Oscar too....and it's only after Floyd's retirement that Cotto and Williams became factors. Forget...
I DISTINCTLY remember (because unlike you I was a huge fan of boxing at that time)...NUNN being mentioned as the guy Leonard should fight next but...
btw...Harrelson's performance in that film was incredible.
Well Leonard faced Lalonde in November 1988. By that point in time....Nunn had beaten Tate and Roldan and Barkley had fucked up Hearns....
You have a hard on for Cotto, as you do for every Rican fighter. Hatton was all the talk at the time: P4P #4 or 5. Undefeated in 43 fights,...
word. Yet Cdogg, REED and others wanna act like Lalonde was some Joey Maxim or something....
Come on man...I only did that once...
:lol: Very good.
Forget De La Hoya...HATTON meant more than Cotto, Margarito and Williams. Hatton was a top 5 P4P fighter and undefeated. Far more talk was around...
"How dare anyone mention Leonard and Floyd in the same sentence" That's what's sickening to you, elitist. My logic is sound and...
Sure he'll get knocked down. Tito always gets knocked down. So what? he'd still obliterate Cuevas eventually. If Joe Louis fought David Tua,...
Who cares? The point is that he'll win. Foreman beat Frazier more impressively than Ali beat him. Who cares?
Dude, we'll have to agree to disagree. I see the May-Honey fight as a one-sided slaughter.
Separate names with a comma.
