can't we have a discussion about which fighters had which ones' numbers without you getting all sensitive about poor little Shane? :lol:...
so you're saying Forrest::Mosley as Barkley::Hearns? :laughing: even an opinion such as this is laughable. first of all, you imply that Mosley...
peak vs. peak Forrest is better than Mosley. but because of his injuries and lack of signature wins or even fights against his top contemporaries...
bika's a bad-azz and a good boxer too!
maybe. it'd be good that's 4 sure.
sloppy has: dawson tarver g.johnson hopkins rjj/tito winner kessler re it better be one of the above, and not woods. scares me that woods is...
seems like jc's focus his whole career has been money. maybe "he's" the one who needs to bite the bullet if he intends on adding a major name to...
knowing hopkins he prolly is asking for too much, and over-estimatung his worth.
whar zoo would've brought to the table that would've given PBF so much trouble, circa 2002, is not so much pressure or volume, but timing,...
:laughing: :laughing: :laughing:
here's some that i would've liked to see, that "could've" happened: Wright vs. Ouma Jirov vs. Black Panther @190 Tua vs. Tyson Harry Simon...
well, it won't be long before you're shocked again once PBF is finally KO'd.
oh. Marquez/Guzman almost seems too good to be true. i doubt that fight gets made regardless of what happens. neither guy is a big enough item...
i'll be forced to hate Pacquiao, even after all he's done, if he doesn't make a rematch with JMM. the only acceptable option i can imagine is...
i'm super nervous right now for Bika/Condrington.....NOT !!! :lol:
yes. i have to say. i do get very keyed up in the hours and days leading up to a big fight. even if i'm not rooting for anyone in particular i...
ok. if you want me to be simple and real brief here it is: yes Baldomir was the linear champ; no he wasn't the best fighter in the division.
well, i think i've implied, "yes" fairly clearly in my response. and the reason i wasn't explicit about it is because as i said, it's not...
what you fail to recognize, but which is an obvious truth, is that the significance of that title waxes and wanes over time. there's nothing...
so am i! because it'll be wrong.
i'm sure he did in your fkd up little mind.
you mean as opposed to knocking him out, the way Pavlik did? sorry. but Abraham has no claim whatsoever to the title at 160. He's a paper...
Guzman-Soto winner = Soto
those were definitely the fights i was thinking about when i said he was boring. so you might be right. what i'm still unsure about is Taylor's...
the point is to demonstrate how uncomfortable so many here are with matters of fact. if you look back through most of it, you'll see posters...
uh, this is NOT a fact. and i'm not sure you know what a fact is, judging by your responses. there's one statement in here i've made that was...
no it's not. think again.
:lol:
dude. those are all facts. if you can't get your mind around that, that's not my problem. also, i'm wondering - what is an "objective fact?" as...
Separate names with a comma.
