No i think you're trolling since all your answers are 1 or 2, deliberately provocative lines. You're stirring. I've read your MMA posts and you...
TLC is trolling, stop wasting your time guys.
I don't know if you're trolling or not, but either way, just fucking stop.
Right, but after two decisive losses in the last couple years you can hardly begrudge a guy for taking whatever fight he's most comfortable with...
I have to be honest, as time goes Floyd's adaptability and completeness strategically impresses me more & more & the idea of him beating somebody...
I don't think Pavlik is shot AT ALL, he just can't handle intelligent movement. I usually hate the term 'exposed', but Pavlik has had that frailty...
Any chance Sweet Pea can replicate what Duran managed and take a decision over Ray at 147? I have to say for me it's a 'no', I think Ray wins...
This is the only statement in the thread which doesn't make sense.
Don't think it matters much which division who chooses. Fights against Abraham, Sturm, Green, Bute and Froch are all intriguing. Ward & Martinez...
:lol:
In all honesty, I thought Old man Hearns won the rematch. And in the first fight Hearns was about half a round from a stoppage before getting...
Im a big Tyson fan, but he was only capable of one thing. One. He was prodigiously good at it (and he brought every punch in the game to applying...
Agreed 1000%. People are deceived at the nature of Mike's style by how short he was....he was exclusively a mid range fighter. Very limited...
I do. Junior is fragile. Unless he's gone through a late onslaught puberty since the last time ive seen him.
A very weak junior middleweight against a strong welterweight. Cotto would walk right through him.
There was a program on Radio 4 the other day about Johnson-Jefferies. I missed most of it but I caught the end and an extract from a NYT article...
I'd fancy Shavers, early. But I wouldn't bet much on it.
Al Brown was actually who I meant when i said 'jeff chandler'. Literally no idea what was going on with that brain fart. I think cider somehow...
I think once upon a time there was an understood duty to entertain the people who paid for your mansion & harem which no longer exists.
Hey guys, fancy meeting you's here! What's happening?
David Tua vs Erik Morales Jeff Chandler vs Mike Tyson Randal bailey vs Earnie Shavers Keith Holmes vs Ike Ibeabuchi Mario Veit vs Riddick Bowe...
The fact Tunney never fought any notable black dude makes him a big '?' in my book. Generally, whitey can't fight. Charles most definitely > Tunney.
Vitali's pretty good to watch in his way but he's always fighting half arsed jiggly lard yards. Bottom line, their fights just aren't really worth...
I don't think Ive watched any of their fights since Wlad-Peter. Or Vitali-Sanders whichever was more recent
I fancy Charles would have blootered 13 shades of shit out of him, but your general point is well taken.
Holmes had much more to deter Shavers with at heavyweight. Shavers is allot more bullish against a Lightheavyweight.
Other way round. And I wouldn't put it so deterministically, but that's the basic suggestion, yes. More people = a greater talent pool filtering...
Nah. The point was that because there were so many fewer fighters the top end quality & depth was likely to have been diminished. Population size...
I said many more people took up boxing in previous times, he was using those stats to refute that. It's an interesting discussion if we can find...
Whether the stats are accurate or not it is quite an interesting line of investigation - you think there is a more reliable way of finding out how...
Separate names with a comma.
