here is a radio adress from your boy, clearly saying that the terrorists used boxcutters. http://www.state.gov/s/ct/rls/rm/2006/70314.htm Pargraph 4.
I already asked you. This is what you said. You said that the administration said that the plane was hijacked with ONLY boxcutters. Show me that. Show me a news papaer clipping and online article, something. SHow me the proof that was ever said.
Oh Im Confused. Have you not been asking for months, How can a plane be hijacked using only a boxcutter?
I have been asking how 9-11 could have been carried out with boxcutters. What else have you heard they used? Hold up, I gotta go get another knife I am eating in the school cafeteria, and my plastic knife broke. Those fuckin things sure do know how to ruin a thread. :: be right back.
Do you think if we put yourself and a few of your friends in a room , I could hold you guys hostage with a box cutter ?
Exactly. You just called me a liar, but you said it again. Now what i want from you, is evidence that was reported. I want to see the evidence that said the plane was hijacked using ONLY boxcutters. No other weapons, just boxcutters. Please provide the proof asap
So in other words, you have no evidence that boxcutters weren't used. I guess this thread is over. TFK
Actually, I spoke to my mother on the phone last night, and know for sure that she was home, so there goes that incredibly weak argument. Now show me some evidence that boxcutters weren't used. Besides, what is your point anyway? You think people can't use boxcutters to hijack a plane. So do you think they used other methods? Or do you think the planes weren't actually hijacked? What exactly do you think? You've spent the better part of a month making a total ass out of yourself with all this boxcutter nonsense. I'd hate to think there wasn't an actual point behind it all. TFK
Thats odd, I thought you and petre have been saying it was missles and holograhms and thermite?:dunno:
So you have no evidence, no point to make, nothing at all of value. So you're just arguing for the sake of arguing, because you're a sad little attention whore. TFK
Actually, you haven't said much of anything, other then you don't think boxcutters can be used as lethal weapons. What a waste of bandwidth. TFK
Its sad man, you just liked riding petres coattails thinking he had an argument without ever agreeing or denieing anything he said. You are a sad little follower. Were you not number 1 in petres fan club until he ran into arguments he could not win?:dunno: You were always right behind him saying "fuck yeah" "Team USA". Keep following I+I. Maybe one day you will have some thoughts of your own.
The only thing I agreed with petre on was the fact that the administrations versions of events on 9-11 isn't possible.
I find it funny that many of the same people who say that, believe in holograms, missles, controlled demoltions, etc. The 'official' story may have holes, but these conspiracy theories are just ridiculous. TFK
So there is no other option, either one believes the administrations version of events or one believes that the planes were holograms? :notallthere: