Bradley vs. Pac Second Viewing on Tonight

::

I agree with you. 10-2 isn't ridiculous at all. Anything from 8-4 to 10-2 isn't ridiculous, IMO.

 

agreed

And to the reactionary contingent who are saying "I don't buy this biggest robbery since (whenever) bullshit", I ask the question: In a fight at this level, since Whitaker was robbed in the first Jose Luis Ramirez fight, when has there been a fight with a major consensus score of 8-4, 9-3, 10-2 where the guy with the 2,3 or 4 actually got the official win?

I'm not talking a guy who clearly lost getting a draw (Chavez, Holyfield) ... I am talking 95% of people think you lost and won no better than 2-4 rounds and you WON the fight... how many of those can you name?

There is nothing hyperbolic about calling it the most ridiculous decision since that fight and possibly even more ridiculous than that fight

Bradley shoe-shined gloves and elbows for the majority of the fight... he was consistently on the receiving end of the best shots landed in the fight...

If I spend 2:30 of a round weakly jabbing at your gloves while you do the bare minimum but then in the last :30 you land the 5 best punches of the round, and the only good, clean, effective shots of the round... YOU win the round... Now that only happened in a few of these rounds... It was not the prevailing pattern of the fight... I also think the number of really tremendous, clean body punches by Pacquaio is being overlooked... The decision was absolutely absurd and clearly one of the shittier decisions ever. I have no axe to grind, I wanted Bradley to win and I thought he could... I was rooting for him... he lost by a mile