They wouldn't. Their little club is up there alongside some of the biggest clubs in history and nobody can ever take that away from them. There have been a whole host of clubs that have been Premier League regulars without ever winning anything, nobody will remember them. People will still be talking about Forest and Clough many, many years from now. It was an incredible and unprecedented achievement.
Exactly Celtic supporters born 30 years after the fact know the 1967 team... that's a club's identity
No. Sorry sorry...not demolished. There was a leak in the roof...the whole lot, rotten. Also had a signed program from the final at Estádio Santiago Bernabeau (that's in Madrid, Spain) in '80 as well.
I had a picture of me at the bernabeau posing with Puskas, Di Stefano, Zidane, Butragueno, Thuram and for some reason David Fairclough ... signed by each one Unfortunately it was in my mom's basement when her house was destroyed by an atom bomb
I was at the Battle of Santiago in Chile, '62... Kenneth Aston, the ref signed my ticket ... also saw the 1984 European Cup final... got my picture taken with Grobbelaar and Rush These items were destroyed in an earthquake
Anyway cdogg, I've had enough of administering a Chavez-Camacho-esque beating to you in this thread so get back into The Sound Garden and I'll turn you into Gerald-McClellan-brain-soup.
Punched out Billy Bremner at a pub in Middlesbrough in '88... helped him up and got his autograph Unfortunately I lost it in a typhoon 10 years later
Yeah I'd agree, I suppose it depends on whether you value league titles over European Cups or vice versa, at the moment they are two-up over each other. I'd agree with Hut too that Arsenal are the third greatest club in England.
I value the EC over the league title by a fair margin... that's why Liverpool rates above ManU to me Arsenal has a good argument for 3rd because they have a steady history of quality and lots of league success... but their European exploits are really suspect and I am loathe to say so because of the manner in which they achieved it but Chelsea's combination of European and league success in recent history gives them at least an argument over Arsenal... What works in Arsenal's favor is that Chelsea's long term history is so comparatively wank ... but barring a ludicrous financial collapse, its likely in another 20 years nobody would blink at Chelsea being ranked ahead of Arsenal ... forget Shitty, those fucks still can't make real noise in Europe even with the billions
An expert on Sunderland AFC I am not, but I do know that they have not finished in the top six of the English first division/premier league since the inception of European club fitba. They have won one trophy since the 1930s'. Sunderland were a gigantic pre- WW2 fitba club. So were Bolton Wanderers and Preston North End. None of those clubs should be ranked as 'bigger' then NUFC where the ranking criteria is anything other than 'who won loads of things in the amateur era of Edwardian fitba'. MTF
Liverpool and Man U are clearly the two giants of English fitba. It depends what you like: Man Utd's modern domestic dominance or Liverpool's european dominance in the 70s - 80's. I like the latter. Arsenal are CLEARLY the third biggest English club. The rest are basically nowhere. MTF
Arsenal, without the benefit of Russian mafia cheating, have won 13 EL/PL titles, 13 FA Cups, 2 LC's, 1 UEFA/Fairs Cup and 1 Cup Winners Cup. All spread through their history - a consistently winning club. Chelshit have won 6 EL/PL titles, 8 FA Cups, 5 LC's, 1 UEFA Cup, 2 Cup Winner's Cups and, of course, that unbelievably spawny CL win. Prior to the gangsta turning up, they had won precisely one league title, three FA Cups, two LC's and two Cup Winner's Cups. Basically about the same in their first one hundred years as Brian Clough won. Arsenal are clearly bigger than Chelshit. In twenty years time, Arsenal will still be bigger than Chelshit, who will turn into batshit administration once the mafia stops funding them. MTF
Nah, that's emotion talking And we're not arguing "bigger", we're arguing success... Leeds are "bigger" than Forest but I know whose trophy cabinet I'd rather have ... in 20 years, Chelsea will likely still be a wealthy club with a bunch more silverware ... Arsenal haven't won anything worthwhile in years ... doesn't matter if Vito Corleone owns them or if St. Francis owns them
I honestly cannot remember anything about Chelsea FC from watching fitba growing up. They were a half decent cup side but otherwise anonymous. I cannot remember them ever actually looking like they might win the league until the Russians turned up. And just before he did, Chelsea were basically on the verge of bankruptcy. Chelsea are basically a nothing club. In ten years time, when the mafia pull out, they'l disappear like a stone. Shitty, backed by an actual country, will more likely stay the distance, but history shows that clubs bankrolled by one rich bloke generally don't last very long in the grand scheme of things. MTF
The game's changed, frankly... the amount of money being raked in is unprecedented... I'd love for Chelsea to shrink back to inconsequence but I see zero reason to anticipate that happening
The FA Cup is still a major honour. To say otherwise is patently false. It is not what it was, but it is still a major trophy. Mark my words: once Abramovich fucks off, Chelsea will plunge like so much shite. Their reliance on him is total. They have no other means of generating the kind of money he is personally providing to them. MTF
Despite all the money which has flowed from their recent success, Chelsea are an absolute financial basket case. This is an old article: at 2015, they owed Abramovich over a billion quid. You think they can sustain that sort of loss when he goes? They are dependant on him lock, stock, the facking lot. They have a small stadium, a small core fanbase, massive wages...deep trouble lies ahead for these cunts. MTF
I read that Celtic would have to win the SPL 35 times just to make as much money as whomever finishes dead last in the EPL gets for one season, something like that Who's "bigger"? Celtic or Chelsea? Historically, emotionally? Celtic by light years ... the reality is that Chelsea can spend our whole payroll 100 times, they're waaaay bigger and they make fuckloads of money in merchandising... the old days are gone... when or if Abramovich fucks off, he'll be selling to some other wealthy entity... "doing a Leeds" from the position Chelsea currently sits in is practically impossible nowadays
Chelsea's real popular over here because most Americans know fuck all about the culture, they just like a winner ... listen, I hate them too and I hope you are proven right but I don't think you will be
Celtic aren't in the league Chelshit are, so you aren't comparing apples and apples. Chelshit share the same league as 19 other teams who all equally share an gigantic pot of ridiculous TV cash. For as long as that pot remains gigantic (and the money has actually decreased slightly this year, suggesting it may well have finally plateaued). The only thing which separates them from their other 19 annual domestic competitors is that their owner is richer than all but a couple of them and has proven willing to dump a billion quid of his own cash, on top of all the other money that all the other clubs also receive, in to sustain them. And that seems to have reached it's zenith - even he has decided to scale back because he cannot compete financially with actual nation states. Unless he somehow sells Chelsea to someone who is willing to pay him back his billion quid loan, or he is willing to write it off (unlikely) and the person who buys it has enough money to compete with the nation of Qatar, Chelshit are already at the beginning of their return to the pack. Mark my words. MTF