California high court voids same-sex marriages

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE</div><div class='quotemain'> Godfather, you wouldn't even bash Rock On if you were to see him at a casino or something, and he gave you some gib? [/b][/quote]
I want to take a screw driver to Rock on's head.

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE</div><div class='quotemain'> <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE</div><div class='quotemain'> <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE</div><div class='quotemain'> <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE</div><div class='quotemain'> <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE</div><div class='quotemain'> Doesnt genetic imply that it was passed on?

I believe its more of a odd variation in the brain, and it goes along a spectrum of tendency towards full on homosexuality.

If a culture EMBRACES it, I think that is harmful.  Acceptance as an inevitable, slight mental defect is more like it.  Nothing to celebrate. [/b][/quote]
Yes, it could be. It is possible that it was passed on, in some cases. But so far nobody has been able to prove that homosexuality is genetic because if it were, we could find traces of homosexual behavior in particular families, like we find traces of breast cancer in some families, for instance. I mean, it should be traceable. So this is all just speculation.

We don't know... [/b][/quote]
In any case, I don't think it's consciously chosen. I agree it shouldn't be celebrated or anything but they shouldn't be denied basic rights. [/b][/quote]
they should be treated as any other person would be. [/b][/quote]
Pedofiles and polygamists also fall into the category as "any other person". [/b][/quote]
There is a difference between them. Pedophiles can and often do harm children's psyche and as a result we get sick adults later. Gays do not harm anybody around them. If a person does not harm others, I don't see why he couldn't be dealt with like anyone else

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE</div><div class='quotemain'> Pedofiles and polygamists also fall into the category as "any other person". [/b][/quote]
How can u compare paedophiles with polygamists???

You're a very narrow minded, profoundly ignorant, dangerous human being.

You've got some exciting shit about me?? GREAT!

You wanna blackmail me??? Big, big mistake!!!

Listen u little, ill mannered punk, NO ONE, I REPEAT, NO ONE BLACK MAILS ROCK ON OK?

Haven't you realised that I am too long in the tooth to care about what people think about me let alone a badly brought up, psychologically damaged, irritant like you?

You wanna embarrass me? Please be my guest.

You wanna pass ya lil info along to someone? Punk I have a better idea, if I were you, for maximum coverage, I would open a brand new thread so that all can see and share in the fun.

:Calvin Brock:

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE</div><div class='quotemain'> <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE</div><div class='quotemain'> Yes, being gay is just a heightened form of depravity by genetically inferior individuals.

The big bang didn't design the asshole as a sex hole, it's a poop chute, end of story.

Homosexuals are pathetic.

I hate the way they play up to the generic bendy persona, let everyone know they're a dirty little faggot, and adopt this fake camp persona.

That's why I dont trust them. It's very rare for a fag to just be cool, and be himself. They are so insecure they have to wear their homosexuality on their sleeve.

if I ever saw our resident homo Rock On I'd bash the fuck out of him. Re-arrange his face. Bash him so much his boyfriend wouldn't recognize him when he came home for some ass-loving that night.

I wouldn't want to touch him though, I'd wear black leather killing gloves when I beat the fuck out of him.

I'd be wearing a pork pie hat and a scarf wrapped around my face, to protect me from the inevitable blood spurts.

I'd hit him once in the throat to paralyze him with pain and shock, and inability to breathe, then I'd repeatedly hit him in the eyes and nose to do some damage, not knock him out right away. Then once he was down I'd give him a couple of floppy boot stomps. I usually don't agree with kicking a man when he's down, but I would make an exception with a dirty faggot. I consider them a lower form of life than a rodent. [/b][/quote]
AWESOME!!!!!! I LOVE WHAT YOU WROTE ABOUT ROCK ON!!!!!!!! I AGREE WITH YOU 100%!!!!!!!!!!

I have some really DEVESTATING SHIT on him, if you want, i'll pass it along. [/b][/quote]
Certainly Esk, pass it round

The washed up queen is welcoming the idea, so let's go :Calvin Brock:

 

Rock on im not trying to be a prick but why dont you just come out.

The cloak and dagger shit is getting old. We know you are a gay homosexual. :huh:

 

btw gays absolutely should get all the legal rights a hetero couple does.

As should incest relationships.

Pedophilia is a sickness and disgusting and unfair to group with these 2 imo.

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE</div><div class='quotemain'> As should incest relationships.  :wacko:

[/b][/quote]
I always knew u were a redneck.

Which of your sisters do u enjoying phocking the most? Or is it mummy?

NEWSFLASH! Mr Roboto lays the pipe on Mum

 

Finally some good news in America. Marriage has and always shall be a union between man and woman. I opppose fags, but I do think they have rights. But allowing same sex marriage sends the wrong message to a nation that is already morally corrupt.

Cupey

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE</div><div class='quotemain'> <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE</div><div class='quotemain'> Godfather, you wouldn't even bash Rock On if you were to see him at a casino or something, and he gave you some gib? [/b][/quote]
I want to take a screw driver to Rock on's head. [/b][/quote]
Yes that would be fun too. I can just imagine landing one good stab with the screwdriver, Rock On hurt and bleeding, desperately trying to flee the scene, acting like he's had a backalley lobotomy, while casually chasing after him, and picking measured stabs with the screwdriver. Each time making him bleed some more, hacking him in the face and head, screwdrivering bits of his ear off.

With each hack the lonely middle aged homo would go down like a bitch, then scrabble up and muster another pathetic attempt to run for his life, as I would casually chase after him, with a big smile on my face, hack, chase, repeat.

Then once he didn't get up anymore, but was still breathing, I'd run in zig zags for a few blocks, change my top, take off my scarf and hat, put the screwdriver in the old top, throw it in a bin. Then I'd get in a taxi, go home, and wallow in glee at the festivities of the day.

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE</div><div class='quotemain'> Finally some good news in America. Marriage has and always shall be a union between man and woman. I opppose fags, but I do think they have rights. But allowing same sex marriage sends the wrong message to a nation that is already morally corrupt.

Cupey [/b][/quote]
What message ? That as a hetero that desperately wants to marry and cannot find a girl, you can always marry a guy ?
I don´t think potential marriage has an affect on the sexual orientation of teenagers. It´s either T&A or A&D. :wink:

 

This is nothing but a pyrrhic victory for the homobic lobby.

Homosexuals will marry in every corner of the US.

It is only a matter of time.

The principle is simple and goes thus:

Heterosexuals will not, cannot legislate on the lifestyle of homosexuals - period.

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE</div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE</div><div class='quotemain'> <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE</div><div class='quotemain'> Godfather, you wouldn't even bash Rock On if you were to see him at a casino or something, and he gave you some gib? [/b][/quote]
I want to take a screw driver to Rock on's head. [/b][/quote]
Yes that would be fun too. I can just imagine landing one good stab with the screwdriver, Rock On hurt and bleeding, desperately trying to flee the scene, acting like he's had a backalley lobotomy, while casually chasing after him, and picking measured stabs with the screwdriver. Each time making him bleed some more, hacking him in the face and head, screwdrivering bits of his ear off.

With each hack the lonely middle aged homo would go down like a bitch, then scrabble up and muster another pathetic attempt to run for his life, as I would casually chase after him, with a big smile on my face, hack, chase, repeat.

Then once he didn't get up anymore, but was still breathing, I'd run in zig zags for a few blocks, change my top, take off my scarf and hat, put the screwdriver in the old top, throw it in a bin. Then I'd get in a taxi, go home, and wallow in glee at the festivities of the day.[/b][/quote]
:: :: ::

 

Adam and Eve not Adam and Steve.

The Sly One has Spoken!!

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE</div><div class='quotemain'> This is nothing but a pyrrhic victory for the homobic lobby.

Homosexuals will marry in every corner of the US.

It is only a matter of time.

The principle is simple and goes thus:

Heterosexuals will not, cannot legislate on the lifestyle of homosexuals - period. [/b][/quote]
they will marry and always be considered an abomination into the eyes of all. The founding fathers of this country would have never recognized such a marriage, and their principles as Christians finally reigned supreme. Gay marriage makes me want to throw up.

Cupey

 

Just FYI. One thing I don't agree is people abusing gays, or not giving them medial benefits and stuff like that. I hate people that try to hurt them. That doesn't make sense.

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE</div><div class='quotemain'> <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE</div><div class='quotemain'> This is nothing but a pyrrhic victory for the homobic lobby.

Homosexuals will marry in every corner of the US.

It is only a matter of time.

The principle is simple and goes thus:

Heterosexuals will not, cannot legislate on the lifestyle of homosexuals - period. [/b][/quote]
they will marry and always be considered an abomination into the eyes of all. The founding fathers of this country would have never recognized such a marriage, and their principles as Christians finally reigned supreme. Gay marriage makes me want to throw up.

Cupey [/b][/quote]
they will marry and always be considered an abomination into the eyes of all.

They may be considered an abomination. Many people consider the existenece of my race an abomination ... just like many did the Jews 60 years ago, and probably still do. Must we put our lives on hold until we get everyone's approval? Nope.


The founding fathers of this country would have never recognized such a marriage, and their principles as Christians finally reigned supreme. Gay marriage makes me want to throw up.

In view of what they did to blacks and native Americans, what makes u think those bigots u fondly call founding fathers did not take a penis up their large intestines? The morality of them fathers leaves much to be desired and I doubt gay folks would be lose any sleep about their recognition

Who cares about their Christian principles? Not every one is a believer let alone a christian.


There are 2 distinct issues here

1. Acceptance
2. Gay Rights

Any homosexual who fights or seeks acceptance from heterosexuals should be hanged or beaten to expiration for stupidity and ignorance. No human being must be that stupid. When u r different u don't fight for acceptance from the majority. Why should u? All u have to do is say "fuck u all and your approval, stick it where the sun don't shine" then go fight for your Rights becos that is where it is at.

For the most part, gays could care less about your approval thank god, what they are fighting for is Gay Rights - Rights to be treated equally before the law.

 

Is being a fag protected by the contsitution? Is being "gay" considered a "sex" or "religion". I don't see what rights they have.

Cupey

 

The people u refer to as fags are also human beings Cupey.

If u can marry; they should too.

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE</div><div class='quotemain'> The people u refer to as fags are also human beings Cupey.

If u can marry; they should too. [/b][/quote]
If gays were smart they would start their own religion and then say they are being discriminated against. I think they could win that way.

Cupey

 

I don't think the religion thing will work it would just be another cult.


Yeah Rock you guys could be the bleeding bunhole Dividians. Where christians are baptized...
you guys could have a big nudey party with Hector Jr. Where the christians drink water.... Um...
Well you know.... You guys could drink spuz...and where they fast and eat church bread you guys
could toss each others salad. Your bible could be a playgirl magazine. Seriously Rock being the
activist and man aspiration you should begin organization efforts immediately. A great place to start
would be a small strip of land in Texas called Waco. And remember you'll need guns And a big wall
to keep all the anti-gays away. Just don't make your door password EWW,Girls. To obvious.

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE</div><div class='quotemain'> <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE</div><div class='quotemain'> The people u refer to as fags are also human beings Cupey.

If u can marry; they should too. [/b][/quote]
If gays were smart they would start their own religion and then say they are being discriminated against. I think they could win that way.

Cupey [/b][/quote]
Why link homosexuality and religion?

Regardess of religious beliefs, rights for people derive from being human beings not believers. Phock religion!

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE</div><div class='quotemain'> The people u refer to as fags are also human beings Cupey.

If u can marry; they should too. [/b][/quote]
Yeah and those people in Fla. hit by the Hurricane that you wished harm to come to weren't?
The fact you cannot see how contradictory most of your post are shows your not as smart as
you pretend to be. Or your just 57 years old and hoping someone responds. I'm thinking the
latter,HumanRobot.


PS hope Carlos is doing good and you got the fudge off your sheets.

 

If California does quit letting cocksucking take-it-up-the-ass happy homo couples get married, my condolences to Esk and Rainmaker. Will Esk have to give the ring back? :YeahRight:

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE</div><div class='quotemain'> <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE</div><div class='quotemain'> The people u refer to as fags are also human beings Cupey.

If u can marry; they should too. [/b][/quote]
If gays were smart they would start their own religion and then say they are being discriminated against. I think they could win that way.

Cupey [/b][/quote]
Gays have "married" through religion for years. In San Francisco, there have been gay churches that have been marrying homosexuals for decades and nobody has ever said anything. People have never bothered them, as far as I know...

But gays nowadays are no longer concerned with religious marriage; what they want is civil marriage. That's the problem.

 

Actually, this whole thing about gay marriage is full of obscure or downright equivocal assumptions and that's why people get so confused and very often do not know which way to go when deciding what to do.


First of all, many gays argue that they the law discriminate against them because it does not allow them to marry. That's a lie. Gays can marry alright. The law does not ask you whether you are gay or not when you are going to marry. The law is not anti gay. It's anti SAME SEX MARRIAGE, not anti gay.

If you are gay and you want to marry, you can marry. In fact, gays have been marrying for centuries and the Governor of Georgia, who considers himself "gay" is a prime example of that: he is married. He could not marry another guy, of course, but he can marry. But for the same token, a straight guy can not marry another straight guy, either. The law does not ask you whether you are gay or not. Even if you are NOT gay, you can not marry a person of the same sex.

Therefore, the law is not "anti gay." It's anti same sex marriage. Period, end of issue.

Second, marriage is not a "right." When homosexuals argue that they are being denied "a right," they are not being completely truthful. The fact is that a marriage license is similar to a driving license: not everyone can apply and get one. It's not a "right" that you get automatically. You have to qualify for it. If it were a right, you would be able to marry your own sister, for instance. But you can't. The law is not all embracing and welcomes every one.
The reason many people want to wrap this whole topic into a "rights" issue is because that way they can better get to the core of American's consciousness and sell it to them as if it were a "civil rights" issue when it clearly it is not. The reason they do that is because once you have accepted this premise, it is more difficult to oppose the homosexual lobby.

Third, the law does not "discriminate" against gays. It doesn't. Since gays can marry a person of the opposite sex, they have, in fact, the ability to marry if they wish to do so. What the law does is present us with limitations. Many limitations.

For instance:

You can marry a person, but only as long as the person is of the opposite sex.

The person can not be a near relative of yours.

The person has to be of consenting age.

The person has to be legally sane.

It can only be one person at a time.

The person you are marrying can not be married at the time of marrying you. Therefore, the law does not automatically give EVERYBODY the "right" to marry anyone they want. It doesn't work that way. If the laws "discriminate" against gays, it also "discriminaties" against pedophiles and polygamists. I don't know why then we should only listen to homosexuals complaints regarding this issue? A lot of other people have the exact same problem but we simply say: "Sorry..." when they come kocking on our doors with their issues.


Fourth, this is not a civil rights issue. In fact, it has nothing to do with it. The reason the left wants to wrap this whole topic into a "civil rights" issue is because that way they can better get to the core of American's consciousness and sense of outrage and sell it to them as if same sex marriage were a "civil rights" issue when it clearly it is not. Homosexuals and the left fighting for same sex marriage laws want to portray themselves as the Black guy from the South fighting the Jim Crow laws of the past. This lends them a romantic aura of self sacrifice and martyrdom that the homosexuals, in fact do not deserve.


Etc, etc, etc. I mean, there are many other manipulations that the homosexual lobby has been pulling over our heads without pur noticing. There are many other little twistings and spins that the left has done with this issue and that's the reason well meaning people have not been able to see clearly. As a result, many of them have fallen for the pro-same sex marriage propaganda withouth noticing how deceiving these arguments are.

I will continue later.

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE</div><div class='quotemain'> <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE</div><div class='quotemain'> <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE</div><div class='quotemain'> <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE</div><div class='quotemain'> The people u refer to as fags are also human beings Cupey.

If u can marry; they should too. [/b][/quote]
If gays were smart they would start their own religion and then say they are being discriminated against. I think they could win that way.

Cupey [/b][/quote]
Gays have "married" through religion for years. In San Francisco, there have been gay churches that have been marrying homosexuals for decades and nobody has ever said anything. People have never bothered them, as far as I know...

But gays nowadays are no longer concerned with religious marriage; what they want is civil marriage. That's the problem. [/b][/quote]
So why do they have a problem with Civil Unions? [/b][/quote]
Because civil unions are limiting to the states they are in, are not usually recognized by other states, and do not ecompass the full range of legal benefits that a marriage sanctioned by the federal government offers.